Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Andy from Chapel Hill
"It is “assumed” law, not “settled” law."

No it is settled. It's the plain language of the text. Do you also think a president can redefine the 2nd amendment through an executive order?

30 posted on 08/21/2019 10:42:04 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: mlo

Among countless legal tretises on the subject available on line, please see:

https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/birthright-citizenship-fundamental-misunderstanding-the-14th-amendment

“Birthright Citizenship: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment”

It is “assumed” law, not “settled” law.


45 posted on 08/21/2019 10:50:42 AM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: mlo
-- Do you also think a president can redefine the 2nd amendment through an executive order? --

He can if SCOTUS goes along with it. Courts redefine and hallucinate things into being on a regular basis. The RKBA is a great example of that.

55 posted on 08/21/2019 11:06:14 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson