Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
Sorry to repeat myself...

Even Barry Goldwater, who you cite as authority, disagrees with you. Recommend you take a second look at his words you offer here for your "we are screwed" perspective:

"They reflect the view of a majority of the leaders of one of our parties, and of a strong minority among the leaders of the other...

Yes, there are indeed two parties and it is our fault one is dominant over the other. The means to correct that condition are on the table right in front of us.

Take a look at the overwhelming number of R counties across the nation. The solution is to effectively increase activity at the local level in a way that influences action at the federal level. That, of course, requires some "stand up" level of guts.

Thinking there is a single uniparty only supports the "why even try" view.

You can have the last word.

23 posted on 08/22/2019 8:25:09 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Arguing the Founders intended the weaker of 2 possible forms of NBC for its leader is a scam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot
Consider the perspective: things were this bad 59 years ago. It would be folly to think that the party merger based on left-wing dogma decelerated from that point, especially given the views expressed by the contemporary contingent conservatives refer to as RINOs.

And an accusation of argumentum ad verecundiam should be followed with proof to its contrary; the author (really L. Brent Bozell Junior) confirms what I’m saying and denying it is argumentum ad lapidem.
24 posted on 08/22/2019 8:45:30 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson