My other concern is that "conservative" outlets like the Federalist refused the article. It clearly lays out the bias but since it didn't affect them, they passed on publishing.
My point was, she’s relying on one outlet and that outlet is controlled by the enemy.
That and I was taking issue with a facebook page being called a site. Sure, it’s a set of pages but the term site makes it sound like a website which it is not. With a website, you can make a good backup and if it gets taken down, you can have it back up in a day or three, albeit with a different domain name possibly, depending on who you chose to get your domain name from in the first place.
She should have a website and cross post on the website and facebook with every facebook post having a link to her website. That way if facebook bans her, people know where to find her.
A LOT of people HAD a youtube channel and nothing else and when they got banned by youtube, they effectively disappeared.
All their eggs were in one rotting leftist basket.
yunnastand?