Skip to comments.
Lots of Sealed Indicrments (60,000?) Currently in District Courts Nationwide [Video Link]
Praying Medic [Video] on YouTube ^
| Praying Medic
Posted on 08/07/2019 2:25:52 AM PDT by FRinCanada2
VIDEO Commentary Q sourced - 60,000 ??? Sealed indictments may be released soon !
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 5by5; bloggers; bombshell; boom; crime; imiss8xhan; indictments; looneyqs; loons; popcorn; q; qloons; qookery; qtrash; thestorm; tictock; trustsessions; wwg1wga; zzz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-137 next last
To: Pollard
This isn't PACER, but its based off of it.
Interactive Map
Submitted for perusal.
61
posted on
08/07/2019 6:25:03 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bagster
https://qmap.pub/cases ???
no better than an image
I can and have made websites, just like I can and have made images
62
posted on
08/07/2019 6:35:40 AM PDT
by
Pollard
(If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
To: bagster
63
posted on
08/07/2019 6:41:03 AM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: bagster
Ohhh kooky Q advocate coming to the rescue
Just quit already. Take the L
64
posted on
08/07/2019 6:42:05 AM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Nifster
Take the L Yea, you said that already.
Losers take the L before the game is over.
I will not join you, but thanks for the invite.
😃
65
posted on
08/07/2019 6:50:52 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Pollard
no better than an image Okay. Have it your way. It's made up out of nothing.
As far as you know.
66
posted on
08/07/2019 6:52:48 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Nifster
Oh puhleeeze. You're welcome.
67
posted on
08/07/2019 6:56:31 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bagster
“Sex Trafficking Conspiracy”??
Don’t conspiracies involve more than one person?
68
posted on
08/07/2019 7:01:22 AM PDT
by
nesnah
(Liberals - the petulant children of politics)
To: FRinCanada2
69
posted on
08/07/2019 7:02:13 AM PDT
by
Agatsu77
To: nesnah
Dont conspiracies involve more than one person? Yup.
70
posted on
08/07/2019 7:03:19 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: FRinCanada2
71
posted on
08/07/2019 7:04:40 AM PDT
by
dforest
(tJust shut up Obama. Maybe everyone should just shut up!)
To: dforest
Fix your tagline.
72
posted on
08/07/2019 7:10:37 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Ann Archy
73
posted on
08/07/2019 7:52:25 AM PDT
by
aces
(and)
To: bagster; FRinCanada2
Yes, there are a few thousand sealed indictments in the federal court system, and Epstein was one of them. But there are not 60,000+ sealed indictments, not even close. Unlike you, I have a PACER account and I have looked at the data, and what appear on its face to be a sealed indictments are actually sealed documents, some of which are indictments and most of which are not. The so-called “sealed indictments” include search warrant applications, wiretap applications, applications to protect the identity of witnesses, bail related financial disclosures, and post conviction sentencing reports.
I will post a screen shot as an example if you show me how to do it, but only if you both promise to stop spreading false information as to the number of sealed indictments.
To: Labyrinthos
Thank you Labyrinthos !
Thank you for bringing facts to these discussions where hyperventilating speculation is substituted for facts.
75
posted on
08/07/2019 8:00:21 AM PDT
by
Reily
To: FRinCanada2
As soon as all the perverts over on 8Chan have been profiled, the indictments will be unsealed. Getting closer, 8Chan was shut down on the weekend. /sarc
To: Scooter100
You really think the regular posters were posting that garbage?
77
posted on
08/07/2019 8:21:57 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: wastedyears
If there was porn being posted all day long, every day, in virtually every subchannel, wouldn’t you consider them, ipso facto, “regular posters”?
To: wastedyears
Yes, it does of it is all about supposedly verifying and explaining Q. Doesn’t mean it can’t be considered as a source, but does mean it belongs on the Q thread—especially since the whole thing is erroneously based.
To: bagster
80
posted on
08/07/2019 8:59:21 AM PDT
by
VTenigma
(The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-137 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson