Nonsense, here again you simply project your own failings onto me.
But let's see if I can help you understand the reality.
Your claim that John Brown's "secret six" were all wool merchants & associates can indeed be true, if and only if, by "associates" you refer to the following fact:
So there is no doubt that John Brown's "secret six" were connected, aka "associated" with wool merchants by fewer than six degrees of separation.
John Brown himself was indeed a wool merchant, until 1848 -- 11 years before his raid on Harper's Ferry.
A further point to remember is that wool and cotton do not directly compete.
Cotton is more popular in warm weather, wool in colder climates.
Today you can buy blends of cotton & wool -- i.e., Viyella (55%-45%) or Clydella (81%-19%).
These demonstrate that the two materials don't so much compete as compliment each other.
There is no evidence (outside Marxist dialectical theory) suggesting John Brown opposed slavery to increase prices for wool.
In fact, Brown operated a station on the Underground Railroad, in Western Pennsylvania, 10 years before he got into the wool business.
Yeah, he went bankrupt twice. Apparently he figured that being the Antifa lacky for Wealthy interests in the North East was more profitable. His efforts to organize the Massachusetts wool merchants just never went anywhere.
And yes, cotton and wool do directly compete. The vast majority of people wanted cotton, because it was cooler and less irritating than wool. If cotton wasn't available, the usage of wool would have increased dramatically, because back in those days, they didn't have very much to chose from.