Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster
 
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI26 Jul 2019 - 10:44:45 AM
[Smoke & Mirrors]
How do you attempt to keep the 'narrative' in play [control the 'sheep']?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-launch-impeachment-investigation-with-bid-for-grand-jury-info-insist-mueller-delivered📁
Key sentence:
Nadler called the grand jury materials “critically important” for their investigation.
Does Nadler understand that the 'critically important' material requested would be illegal for AG Barr to disclose?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/04/mueller-report-attorney-general-grand-jury-information/📁
"This means Attorney General Barr must redact grand-jury material from the Mueller report before disclosing it to Congress. Democrats will complain long and loud about this, but I don’t see how Barr can be reasonably faulted for following the law. Congress, after all, has the power to legislate an amendment to Rule 6(e) that would permit disclosure of grand-jury materials from a special counsel investigation to appropriate congressional committees."
Will members of the D party Congress attempt to amend Rule 6(e) in order to obtain grand jury material deemed 'critically important'?
No?
Logical thinking, why?
Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument?
People elected 'knowingly' spreading false-information [disinformation]?
Puppets follow orders.
Think for yourself.
Q

79 posted on 07/26/2019 11:14:46 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

#3407 reminds me of a comment someone made about Rachel Maddow. They said Maddow always made it sound like the one piece of information they still didn’t have was the most important, critical piece of information that would make all Dem dreams come true about POTUS.


83 posted on 07/26/2019 11:19:31 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

They won’t amend the rule because it can be used to get grand jury testimony against any of them in the future and the past.


109 posted on 07/26/2019 11:52:58 AM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

“Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument? ”

So that you can keep the fools in your own base fooled. And angry. And playing the wronged victim. Such is the state of American “civics” at this late hour.


127 posted on 07/26/2019 12:17:43 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast (You may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson