[generally]

*IF* JE died in custody, there would obviously not be a trial. And obviously he could not testify or divulge info about other derps.

But it seems that any evidence (videos, pictures, notes, etc.) that were confiscated during raids on his property would still be evidence. And if that evidence showed other derps committing crimes, it would still be pursued. Right?

So can anyone tell me, what are the main advantages to the derps in killing off JE? How much would that really help them?

[HarleyLady27]

So can anyone tell me, what are the main advantages to the derps in killing off JE? How much would that really help them?
**********************************************************

I know what you are saying, and I agree with you, BUT Hillary ‘Smelly Old Bag’ and Bill ‘Sex Offender’ Clintons; Obamas, Bidens, and all the others do not want this information out...especially to us ‘deplorables’...but what THEY don’t understand, WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT IT and so killing Epstein or any of the others is stupid, WE ALREADY KNOW WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN AND WITH WHOM...hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

[little jeremiah]

Maybe derps wanted to snatch JE because he knew where more incriminating evidence is that LE doesn’t have yet? And derps want to get it before LE?

[christianbasque]

IF* JE died in custody, there would obviously not be a trial. And obviously he could not testify or divulge info about other derps.
*************************************************
If, as repeatly stated, “we have it all”, how do we manage to let the DS kill JE under our noses?