What exactly don't you agree with? There are several different issues stated in that article.
Which of the following don't you agree with..
1) The Standard Big Bang model, as is, without modification, simply doesn't work.
2) Because the SBB model doesn't work, Inflation Theory was invented.
3) The reasons given why some very prominent cosmologists do not believe in the Inflation Theory.
Inflation theory is not a theory--it's merely a SWAG hypothesis which we cannot test, and goes against every other theory of physics that we can see and measure. It's very similar to "Dark Matter," a substance physics uses to balance equations, but has yet to be discovered. It's merely a crutch to lean on so that we don't have to admit outright that our math, and our physics, is probably wrong--or at least not advanced enough to describe our universe.
I'm going with "God did it." While I understand that many scientists view that with disgust, I view with disgust their refusal to admit a possibility without ever trying to eliminate it scientifically. They just outright dismiss it without consideration.
That's not science.
I admit, "God did it" is very difficult, if not impossible, to prove. However, it is also pretty difficult, if not impossible, to disprove. Given our current understanding of physics in general, and cosmology in particular, I'll go with it until proven otherwise.