To: GOP Congress
This is not a federal indictment, but a STATE indictment, specifically, New York State. As the arresting authority, they have first digs at Trump, even before the feds can weigh in. This is key, because as the arresting authority, they can control the prosecution strategy, the venue, and the narrative. Good heavens ... would you please get even the most basic facts straight before you post this sh!t?
Just read the 'effing indictment, man.
It's titled: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Jeffrey Epstein (Defendant)
It was filed in the Southern District of New York, which is the District Court for the U.S. Department of Justice.
7 posted on
07/08/2019 8:42:44 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave." -- Frederick Douglass)
To: Alberta's Child
Good heavens ... would you please get even the most basic facts straight before you post this sh!t? Just read the 'effing indictment, man. It's titled: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Jeffrey Epstein (Defendant)
But thank you for playing. We have some lovely parting gifts backstage, including the home version of The Provacateur Troll Game.
13 posted on
07/08/2019 8:49:08 AM PDT by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
To: Alberta's Child
Yep, this is federal. Thanks for posting.
17 posted on
07/08/2019 8:50:56 AM PDT by
lerker
To: Alberta's Child
Thank you for pointing out the obvious.
18 posted on
07/08/2019 8:51:16 AM PDT by
Rusty0604
(2020 four more years!)
To: Alberta's Child
25 posted on
07/08/2019 8:52:47 AM PDT by
gaijin
To: Alberta's Child
Good heavens ... would you please get even the most basic facts straight before you post this sh!t? Beat me to it. Check my tagline.
30 posted on
07/08/2019 8:58:08 AM PDT by
KevinB
("Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." - Charles Darwin)
To: Alberta's Child
It's titled: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Jeffrey Epstein (Defendant) Basic facts bump!
32 posted on
07/08/2019 9:01:50 AM PDT by
mac_truck
(aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
To: Alberta's Child
Yeah! I was confused buy that also. Head spinning
To: Alberta's Child
The SDNY reports to Barr.
35 posted on
07/08/2019 9:04:00 AM PDT by
CaptainK
('No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker')
To: Alberta's Child
The fan-fiction people keep writing on this has really become tiresome when no one knows anything about much regarding this.
To: Alberta's Child
It was filed in the Southern District of New York, which is the District Court for the U.S. Department of Justice.
_________________
Yes, and Comey is an AUSA in the SDNY U.S. Attorneys office. What we need to know is what section and subject matter she is normally assigned to work in. If she gets the case despite the subject matter of the charges falling outside her section, we should be very suspicious. Likewise, it the charges are purposely framed to place the case in her section, it raises a red flag.
To: Alberta's Child
52 posted on
07/08/2019 9:44:20 AM PDT by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
(Isn't it funny that the very people who scream "My body, my choice" wants a say in your healthcare?)
To: Alberta's Child
Even worse: almost three years in, the DoJ is still anti-Trump.
To: Alberta's Child
To: Alberta's Child; GOP Congress
yeah, and multiple freepers have already disproven the fake meme that Comey’s daughter will be the prosecutor ...
84 posted on
07/08/2019 1:55:51 PM PDT by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: Alberta's Child
In addition, the case was filed by the Public Corruption Unit which is odd for a sex crimes case against a private citizen.
This indictment is against Epstein and Epstein only, yet has a conspiracy charge in it. Conspiracy is not a one man crime.
The implication being, some additional corrupt public officials may be indicted. Keep the popcorn at the ready!
89 posted on
07/09/2019 4:11:45 AM PDT by
IamConservative
(I was nervous like the third chimp in line for the Ark after rain had started falling.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson