Posted on 07/02/2019 7:10:22 AM PDT by Elderberry
Looks like there were 4 cases before the State Bar, One for unpaid fees resulted in only a reprimand, another for basically client neglect resulted in a fully probated suspension (don’t know for how long), another for client neglect resulted in a six month active suspension remainder probated, final case resulted in 3 year active suspension (no probation) looks to have involved client neglect and mishandling of funds. Was substantial restitution involved in the cases. Looks to me like the State Bar did take some mitigating factors into account. For others here I am no fan of the Texas State Bar.
Your interpretation seems right on point.
Looks like the 3 yr suspension was the cumulative effect of all of the other misconduct as well.
This also looks very much how state bars would approach these types of issues.
Whatever, friend. To each his own. I’ll not call you names( I am certain you wouldn’t in anything other than anonymous internet chat).
Any professional can be impeached for the right price. But you already know that.
“Why do you swallow what her enemies claim?”
It didn’t seem to be DIRECTLY related to politics!
It never ceases to amaze me how many HERE really, really want to believe what Big Media sells, and are willing to call others “morons”, just to maintain their illusion.
Thanks Elderberry
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.