Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democrats are Going to Impeach Trump without a Crime
Vanity | 6/23/2019 | Self

Posted on 06/23/2019 12:55:22 PM PDT by CptnObvious

It's as obvious as the nose on your face. The Democrats are going to vote impeach Trump without a specifying crime.

They will say he colluded with the Russians, despite the Mueller report says that he did not. They will say he Obstructed Justice by firing FBI director Comey (but not firing the Special Counsel Mueller). They will make up, out of whole cloth whatever is necessary to support a vote on Trumps Impeachment in the U.S.House of Representatives.

They will do this to weaken Trump in the next election, as they know the vote has no chance in the US House or Senate.

They know they cannot run against Trump on the Economy, on Immigration, or on lowering Taxes (knowing that they cannot lie that they can do better than Trump on Taxes). They know they cannot do or lie that they can so better on Trade Deals.

Oh Health Care, Obama's lies have poisoned Americans on Democratic Health Care. That it would be more "Affordable" , saving $2000 per individual per year, it cost $2000 MORE PER YEAR instead. He lied that Americans could keep their Doctors, Hospitals, and Insurance. Not only this, but majority of the Healthcare Exchanges went bust. Obamacare is dead, dead dead. And that is why Democrats are running on Medicare for ALL or some other form of Socialized Medicine. Yet this too is unpalitable for the majority of Americans. Their hand is busted on this too.

In short, the Democrats are holding a BUSTED HAND INTO THE NEXT ELECTION and TRUMP has a ROYAL FLUSH. They have NO CHOICE BUT TO BLUFF. That Bluff will be a vote to Impeach the President.

But they have one problem. Most Americans have TUNED THEM OUT LONG AGO. They stopped listening when the Mueller Report came out. They stopped answering Polls knowing that they could be DOXED, beat up by ANTIFA and/or be FIRED at WORK months ago.

What will the vote to Impeach Trump and the Media screaming about it? More Americans will just TUNE OUT and walk away form the Democrat Party.

Will it work and the Democrats get to "Transform America" fundamentally (into Socialism) as Obama said? Well, we will see if a BUSTED HAND BLUFFED BEATS TRUMPS ROYAL FLUSH.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2020election; declassification; election2020; fbi; fisa; impeachment; justinamash; nancypelosi; tomsteyer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: grumpygresh

“This country really does need to have an amicable division.”

It’s a good idea. The geography would make it difficult to settle the logistics.


41 posted on 06/23/2019 3:06:01 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Worry ends where faith begins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

Bump! I’ve been thinking about the testimony that will be given during the proceedings. That post exactly summarizes my thoughts. Thanks!

That post precisely explains why the Rats won’t try to impeach President Trump.


42 posted on 06/23/2019 3:06:43 PM PDT by upchuck (No muzzy is fit to hold public office - their cult (religion) is incompatible with the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious
It will just harden the resolve of his supporters and remind everyone that the country is in the midst of a civil war.

If they were smart, they would try to lull Trump's supporters into a state of overconfidence and contentment.

43 posted on 06/23/2019 3:08:14 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
There will be no impeachment. There will be no Articles of Impeachment voted out of the Judiciary Committee without them being shown to be a total joke in front of the American People. The Republicans on the Committee starting with Jim Jordan and Matt Gaetz will savage any witness arguing for impeachment and will totally eviscerate any house-of-cards charges that Nadler tries to conjure up.

But even in the unlikely event that by some miracle Articles are voted out of Committee, they have to have 218 yes votes on the House floor in order to impeach the President. They have around 50 or 60 at best. Pelosi doesn't dare hold a floor vote with that few yes votes. The loss would be so miserably embarrassing that it might just cost her the Speakership.

44 posted on 06/23/2019 5:09:30 PM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

I think this has become an albatross around their neck - there’s more ways to lose than there are to win. If they were going to impeach they’d need to have already done so in the House. The Senate will take much longer - too long to impact 2020 and when the people reelect PDJT then it’s all over. It’d also require R’s to have access to ALL of the Mueller investigation documents, warrants, reports, etc., which is the last thing they want. It would open Pandora’s box. This is what Pelosi knows and why she’s dragging her feet on it, throwing out a bone every so often.

IMHO the game right now is to figure out how to retain the black vote - e.g. reparations - which will be attractive to some, the question is how many they’ve already lost that will never come back. Also, shutting down their opponents message, this is what all the social media de-platforming is all about. Then they’ll require voter fraud to win the popular vote, so all of these liberal State’s will give their electoral votes to the D. They’re terrified.

They can’t win on message. When your required permanent underclass isn’t doing so badly and sees positive change undelivered by them then they have to manufacture issues. This whole reparations thing has come out of nowhere.

What is really going to cause a collective nuclear head explosion is when PDJT also gets the popular vote and every single electoral college vote goes to him!! I’m dreaming of 100% going to PDJT!! It would be glorious - I really don’t think the left has thought this through at all....but when you’re plans are saturated with pure hatred then logical thought is tough to come by.

These people are just petulant children and they’re being played with by an adult....although that also means they’ll be very nasty and not play nice.


45 posted on 06/23/2019 5:40:45 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Equine1952
".... DJT keeps rubbing their noses in it on Twitter...."

Trump taunts them like a school yard bully to impeach him. Because he knows that if the democRATS try to impeach him, that he is even more certain to win in 2020.

The RATS and the media take the bait every single time.

It's amazing to watch.

46 posted on 06/23/2019 6:02:04 PM PDT by HotHunt (Been there. Done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Nah. They will bloviate, whine, bellyache, complain, accuse; but they know there is nothing there. If they try it, Trump is guaranteed to win the election, 100%. The public won’t allow this farce to go that far.


47 posted on 06/23/2019 6:10:35 PM PDT by vpintheak (Stop making stupid people famous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious
All of the above comments are so helpful to my understanding!!! Thank you all for that! Still, I just wish the Dems would just hurry up and self-implode!!!!!!! 👵🏻💕🙏🇺🇸
48 posted on 06/23/2019 7:03:05 PM PDT by CAGOPgramma (In God we still trust!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

They would only do it with a green light from Republicans. Else the Republicans could do the same thing against the next Democrat. Both parties are corrupt and have led us to this point in time.


49 posted on 06/23/2019 7:08:17 PM PDT by Carry me back (Cut the feds by 90%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Bad enough they suffer TDS - we don’t need to suffer DDS (Dem Derangement Syndrome) to make up for their ‘issues’...


50 posted on 06/24/2019 5:05:09 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
What?

Last time I saw James Clyburn, House Majority Whip, discuss impeachment a few weeks ago, he very clearly said there is not a majority in the Dem House caucus that would vote to impeach Trump.

51 posted on 06/24/2019 5:11:52 AM PDT by IamConservative (I was nervous like the third chimp in line for the Ark after rain had started falling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
Clinton was impeached during his first term and he easily won re-election before he was impeached in 1998. [Sigh].
52 posted on 06/24/2019 1:40:33 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: HChampagne
They will impeach so that they can call Trump “the impeached president”. They will get 52 or 53 votes in the Senate so that they can claim that a majority of the senate wants him removed.
With all due respect to the bitterness of Mitt Romney, after the Senate Republican caucus - i.e., the majority - gets finished with Comey and his co-conspirators, including Robert Mueller, I wonder if even Mitt would do it.

Especially if President Obama is forced to account for what he knew, when, about spying on the political opponent of his party’s nominee for POTUS. Considering how bad that would look, I think the Democrats blink and don’t vote to impeach.


53 posted on 06/24/2019 1:54:43 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
...but to see the answers during the spectacle of an impeachment trial in the senate would be something even CNN could not ignore or spin.

Don't bet on it! Why do you think the media gets away with defamation of politicians in general? The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and of the press, any action based on the content of statements must satisfy narrowly defined requirements, and politicians, as public figures, must also meet significantly higher burdens of proof than an ordinary person. The op-ed argument is that the content is "opinion" aka spin - and facts be damned.

It seems that when it comes to politicians, media can slander and libel with impunity. I wouldn't expect that to change with a Senate trial that exposes democrat liars, seditionists and traitors.

The only thing that will change CNN, MSNBC, Google, YouTube etc., etc. is: conservative, pro-American ownership - or new law that makes the media more accountable for its slander and libel of politicians - or SC decision that makes the media more accountable for its slander and libel of politicians.

54 posted on 06/26/2019 5:50:08 AM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson