[dp0622]

Depends on the type of rock n roll.

Guns N Roses was a YOUNG, ANGRY band. I loved them in my late teens and even early 20s.

I still enjoy listening to them but I won’t pay several hundred dollars to see them.

They ain’t young and angry anymore. More like old and ornery :)

The Beatles’ softer rock can be played at any age and enjoyed.

But overall I agree. Rock n Roll is full of young angst and rebellion against whatever.

Doesn’t have the same appeal when the players are older than the people they are rebelling against :)

[Steve_Seattle]

In my view rock'n'roll is dead, and music in general is in terrible shape. Today we have rap, hip-hop, divas, and a few pretty boys. Rock bands have become dinosaurs.

The music is unimaginative, linear, and repetitive. The melody lines are banal, there is little harmony, and - at the other end of the scale - there is little masculine energy.