Posted on 06/07/2019 5:34:36 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
Nearly one million tickets have been sold for the Women’s World Cup before the start of the tournament on Friday, organisers say.
In the biggest and – Fifa, football’s governing body, hopes – the best Women’s World Cup yet, France play South Korea at the Parc des Princes in the first of 52 games.
The host nation hopes to emulate the success of the men’s team in Russia last year and make history by becoming first country to hold both World Cups at the same time. Among the 24 teams taking part, France are narrow favourites to win the tournament, just ahead of the holders, the USA.
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
Not today.
From what I have seen so far this year, the US team is going to have a hard time repeating. The goaltending is weak and the back line is vulnerable. We will need to score more to offset our defensive weaknesses. And there is no doubt that there is greater parity than 2015.
Australia is a dark horse that could surprise along with favorites like France, Germany, England, and Japan.
First there needs to be a White House invite.
Let’s hope for a France trainwreck today then.
Small chance of that though.
There could be injuries (I went there).
She knelt twice in 2016 (Seattle game, and a USNWT game), and calls herself a walking protest to Trump... but will not be allowed to kneel during the World Cup.
Getting out of the group should be a given (looking at you German men). Then we need to peak up to The Final.
That’s my hope.
SEP 26, 2017:
https://www.starsandstripesfc.com/2017/9/26/16371086/us-soccer-stands-by-policy-standing-national-anthem-rapinoe-kneeling
Whatever
Rapinoe is good for one win all by herself.
Two if she is pissed.
Happy for you.
Go find a good middle school boys game and you can see better, live soccer for free. And probably a lot less hate for the U.S.
Yes! The team captain has also stated that she will never sing the national anthem again.
Anorher hate fest against men!
I think the Womens team could beat the Mens team right now.
Of course, this match against the academy team was very informal and should not be a major cause for alarm.If you see hate for the US at the World Cup let us know.
As to parity: the teams you mention are perfectly capable on any given day of just flat-out beating the U.S. France in particular has speed to burn. (People who haven't been paying attention until now will soon note that the African diaspora has now reached the top tiers of French sport. Just sayin' … but it's obvious out on the field who the dangerous French players are.) If the WWC were played World Series, NHL or NBA style with best of seven rounds, the U.S. would be a solid favorite, with France the likeliest to carry the series to seven games and perhaps win. That wouldn't even be much of an upset. In a single elimination format, however, the winner will have to win four straight games against peer-level opponents. That's tough in any sport. Of the top teams, the U.S. has the best chance of playing through, but even the best team will probably have to dodge a bullet or two along the way. If the bet is U.S. vs. the field, I'd bet on the field. As of this morning, since everyone (surprisingly) seems to be healthy, my crystal ball says the U.S. has an 18.473 percent chance of winning the whole thing, followed closely by France with its home-field advantage. The other top teams aren't far behind.
As an aside, expectations management is a problem for the U.S. team. They've been an elite team for so long that U.S. fans take it for granted. Fans tend to lose sight of the fact that U.S. success is artificially inflated by the fact that we play through CONCACAF. No offense to Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Panama, T&T, etc., who play as hard as they can, but Canada is the only worthy opponent in our region. The U.S. qualifies for the Olympics and World Cup almost by default. It's theoretically possible for the U.S. to fail to qualify -- in 2011, chronically underperforming Mexico scraped together a team and got its only win against the U.S., which had to play through the wildcard bracket to qualify -- but we essentially take qualification for granted. If we had to play through Europe or Asia, we would have a much stiffer test. The U.S. team would have to battle to qualify and would probably sit at home from time to time. The fans would have a much better appreciation of the level of competition at the top level of the sport.
The goaltending is average, not outstanding. We got used to having the best goalkeeper in the world. Hope Solo was a hot mess off the field, but we miss her now. She might have aged out anyhow by this point, but it sure ain't the same without her back there. I'm not really in a position to judge, but there is some talk that Aubrey Bledsoe of the Washington Spirit may be the best U.S. goalkeeper at this point. For some reason she's never been in the national team mix. Ellis has done a good job over the last four years bringing in new field players (and maybe overdone it a bit), but the pipeline seems to be shut down at goalkeeper. For years, Hope Solo owned the position and Ashlynn Harris was No. 2. It was awfully tough for anyone else to get a look. We may be paying for that now.
So true. The men’s U-20 is MUCH better quality soccer, and MUCH more enjoyable to watch, than women’s soccer. The level is in between Men’s and Women’s national level. You have very good ball control, sharp passes, and planned attacks like the Men’s, but it’s faster paced, like women’s, because they are not quite to the level that one on one attacks are wasted effort.
That is one player.
Ever hear of the saying: Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater...?
Actually not yes. Rapinoe will not be kneeling during the National Anthem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.