Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: logi_cal869

They say the shot was the equivalent of an image of a building in New York City taken from Paris.

In any case, I too thought with the scopes they have today they would be able to take a much clearer photo than that.

We have really sharp images of Pluto and its satellite moons. But these images of course were taken by spacecraft we had sent there.


15 posted on 06/04/2019 6:53:11 PM PDT by ETL (REAL Russia collusion! Newly updated FR Page w/ Table of Contents! Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: ETL

“In any case, I too thought with the scopes they have today they would be able to take a much clearer photo than that.”

If it was a terrestrial telescope used to take the photo (I’m sure it was), there might not have been time to utilize adaptive optics capability (to “erase” the effects of atmospheric turbulence). Also, the existing photo is probably pretty dang good in terms of resolution.


27 posted on 06/04/2019 7:48:30 PM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

Optics are governed by a theoretical resolving limit called the “diffraction limit.” But most observations from Earth are “seeing-limited” due to atmospheric effects and work at a much lower resolution than the diffraction limit. The distortion introduced by the passage of light through several miles of turbulent atmosphere is the limiting factor. Most advanced observatories use adaptive optics technology to compensate for atmospheric turbulence, resulting in greater image resolution for faint targets, but it is still difficult to reach the diffraction limit using adaptive optics.

I worked for a startup company founded by two telescope optical scientists from the Keck Observatory. We were applying their adaptive optics technology to free space optical communication.


34 posted on 06/04/2019 8:22:19 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

The problem is that its moving too fast, too close to the camera. Something like Pluto, while moving fast as well, appears slower at this distance.

For example, it is much easier to photograph a motorcycle race at a distance—you are able to track the motion and keep the frame in focus.

On the other hand, if an item is crossing your plain of view and you are trying to track it with a huge telephoto lens, you are going to have a bear of a time shooting in focus and panning at the proper speed.

(I was a professional sports photographer for 14 years. I dealt with this stuff every day.)


47 posted on 06/05/2019 1:45:55 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (If we get Medicare for all, will we have to show IDs for service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson