33,000 tons is comparable to World War I era dreadnaughts.
1 posted on
05/29/2019 9:24:15 AM PDT by
C19fan
To: C19fan
I guess the name Chernobyl was taken?
2 posted on
05/29/2019 9:26:42 AM PDT by
Dr. Ursus
To: C19fan
If the Artic is warming can we assume the ice is melting on it’s own. So why do we need three bemouth icebreakers to plow through the ice choked waters?
3 posted on
05/29/2019 9:28:12 AM PDT by
redangus
To: C19fan
Can’t they just sprinkle some salt on it?
4 posted on
05/29/2019 9:29:47 AM PDT by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: C19fan
So the Arctic is warming and they need a much more massive icebreaker ship? Yeah that makes a ton of sense.
7 posted on
05/29/2019 9:35:29 AM PDT by
Migraine
To: C19fan
a new icebreaker...to dominate the newly warming Arctic region If its warming why would they need an icebreaker?
9 posted on
05/29/2019 9:39:17 AM PDT by
tbpiper
To: C19fan
Wasn’t the arctic supposed to be ice free by now?
10 posted on
05/29/2019 9:40:59 AM PDT by
aquila48
To: C19fan
Lol! You don’t need a huge icebreaker to dominate seas the AGW crowd insist will be ice free!
12 posted on
05/29/2019 9:42:22 AM PDT by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: C19fan
...the countrys plans to dominate the newly warming Arctic region. If it's 'warming' then why need an ice breaker?.............
13 posted on
05/29/2019 9:42:30 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
To: C19fan
Mr. President! We have an icebreaker Gap! Just look on the big board
15 posted on
05/29/2019 9:50:56 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
To: SunkenCiv
18 posted on
05/29/2019 10:01:15 AM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
To: C19fan
Never mind that some of their WWI era dreadnoughts had ... icebreaker bows.
20 posted on
05/29/2019 10:11:57 AM PDT by
Kommodor
(Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
To: C19fan
Now, this is an Ural icebreaker!!!
Yes, Ruskie, in action!
Note: the outboard side is driven!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pq9gBNlgkpw
I’d trade my airhead 650 for this in a heartbeat!
(Same mother, different brother)Kind of a bastard child?
21 posted on
05/29/2019 10:24:17 AM PDT by
DUMBGRUNT
("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message.)
To: C19fan
"Last darn time I ride on one of their new icebreakers..."
22 posted on
05/29/2019 10:27:19 AM PDT by
moovova
To: C19fan
Seems odd that the prow has no “edge” to it at all. Instead, it is pretty much a hemisphere, which would indicate that rather than “cutting” and powering through the ice, and pushing it away to both sides, this thing will belly up on to the ice and break it down by sheer force of the vessel’s weight. I see no provision for pushing the broken ice to each side, so that a conventional ship would have a path to follow. I hope they TESTED the concept before spending all those rubles.
23 posted on
05/29/2019 10:39:28 AM PDT by
Tucker39
("It ishttps://y impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
To: C19fan; All
Anyone have any ideas as to why the two big white platforms beneath the bow and stern
launched with the Ural?
24 posted on
05/29/2019 10:48:06 AM PDT by
TXnMA
(Paraphrasing Adm. Farragut: "Damn the whines for 'impeachment'! Full speed ahead!")
To: C19fan
Quit reading here:
“The Ural, and its two sister ships, are each powered by two RITM-200 icebreakers generating a total of 350 megawatts.”
The author or the proof reader does not have a single clue about the subject.
31 posted on
05/29/2019 12:02:18 PM PDT by
Sequoyah101
(It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just hava few days that don't suck.)
To: C19fan
Last Summer a number of Soviet Russian Artic harbors did not open because the ice didn't melt enough.
32 posted on
05/29/2019 12:18:39 PM PDT by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: C19fan
The wwii carrier my gramps was on, was slightly less than what this icebreaker weighs.
33 posted on
05/29/2019 1:01:55 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: C19fan
36 posted on
05/29/2019 2:07:07 PM PDT by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: C19fan
Don’t get excited ... our new ones due 2024 are the same displacement, but not nuclear, and likely lack the swimming pool and sauna found on most Russian nuke breakers.
39 posted on
05/29/2019 3:55:03 PM PDT by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson