Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Price, contract terms helped Maxar secure [Lunar] Gateway contract
spacenews.com ^ | 05/24/2019 | Jeff Foust

Posted on 05/25/2019 5:26:24 PM PDT by BenLurkin

An ability to get on contract quickly and a price far lower that other companies were key factors in NASA’s decision to award a contract to Maxar Technologies for the first element of the lunar Gateway, the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE).

A source selection statement released by NASA May 23 outlined the agency’s assessment of proposals for the PPE submitted by Maxar and four other companies: Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems and Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC).

The document shows that Maxar, identified in the document as Space Systems Loral (SSL), the former name of its satellite manufacturing division, offered a price well below the other companies. While Maxar offered a firm fixed price of $375 million, other bids ranged from $565.9 million by Northrop to $768.8 million from SNC.

The companies were more closely matched on technical approach, which had an equal rating to price in the evaluation. All the companies received a “Very Good” rating in technical approach with the exception of SNC, which received a “Fair” rating.

Two other factors, management approach and commercial and partnering approach, had lesser weighting that, combined, were equal to either price or technical approach. Both Lockheed and Maxar received Very Good scores in both those categories, while Boeing received Good scores in both. Northrop received a Good score in management and Excellent in partnering, while SNC received a Fair score in management and Excellent in partnering.

Another factor that worked in Maxar’s favor was the ability to start work quickly. The broad agency announcement that NASA used to solicit proposals required companies to submit a signed “model contract” for the work. Companies could take exception to any required clauses but were warned that doing so “could have a negative impact on an Offeror’s potential selection for contract award.”

(Excerpt) Read more at spacenews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: gateway; loral; maxar; nasa
Not related....


1 posted on 05/25/2019 5:26:24 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’m sorry if I’m skeptical, but I just don’t believe a wind turbine is going to generate that much power on the moon.


2 posted on 05/25/2019 7:34:54 PM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson