Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dp0622

I doubt it. They just banned dolls that look like children. I think we a century away at least before pedophilia is accepted if ever.


8 posted on 05/25/2019 4:25:48 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator

When did DOMA pass? Don’t be silly... the plan would be to reduce age of consent down slowly but surely... and then eliminate them entirely.

If Hillary had nominated the last two judges to SCOTUS there would be a right to child rape in the next ten years.


9 posted on 05/25/2019 4:31:54 PM PDT by rwilson99 (How exactly would John 3:16 not apply to Mary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
They won't even mention pedophiles. No need to. It will be packaged as recognizing and respecting children's sexual rights.

It's already happening.

And it's all going to go down a consensual. If she (he) can consent at 18, why not 14?

If at 14, why not 4?

LOVE = LOVE

Got a problem with that, you bigot?

15 posted on 05/25/2019 5:14:16 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

I would be thrilled for you to be right.

You seem a tad sharper than me so I will go with your analysis :)


22 posted on 05/25/2019 7:04:49 PM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

In my youth, and it was not a century ago, openly living together without being married was a scandal that pushed you outside the bounds of polite society, marriage was between an a man and women, nobody would suggest otherwise, abortion was illegal, homosexuality was kept completely private, homosexuals did not adopt children, a child conceived out of wedlock was not acceptable, the couple got married before the baby was born, or the baby was placed for adoption to be raised by a heterosexual married couple, or sometimes if the family had the resources a way was found to keep the baby in the family while protecting the baby from scandal.

Most people went to Church (or Synagogue) at least on the Holy Days. Even the most liberal democrats (except for communists) believed in the freedom of speech, and they did not have safe spaces, they did not need coloring books, coco or teddy bears and would have been profoundly offended at being offered such if someone disagreed with them. They were perfectly willing to debate conservatives, and at the end of the day, all parted friends.

I could go on with the changes that have occurred in the last 60 years but I assure you that if you were alive then and old enough to be aware, you would not recognize this country from that country.

In that day, the castration of children was an unimaginable crime, now it is fashionable, the push is on for murdering newborn babies, and I note that cannibalism seems to be on the verge of becoming the newest fad, and so unlike you,
I think the acceptance of pedophilia looms near. After all, if children at the age of 5 or 6 or so are to be allowed to make the decision to change their gender, undergo the surgery, take the hormones, etc., how long do you think it is going to be before the loons running the govt decide that they are capable of giving sexual consent?

You say a century, I say 10 years, probably less. Sickening, isn’t it?


33 posted on 05/25/2019 7:37:33 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson