Replies

And the passenger GOT OUT to lift the gate.
= = = = = = =

Makes as much ‘sense’ (using ‘makes sense’ here is tantamount to using the word LOGIC when referring to LIBs)
as the stunt itself.

I think their lack of reasoning (bad choice again) was that ‘physics’ would be worrying about smashing through the gate and not ‘guiding’ the vehicle over the water.

Or something along that line....

Right up there with ‘I saw it on the internet’ to ‘I saw it in the movies’ believability.

Now an Avaneti type lawyer will leap up and sue the automobile manufacturer, company that built the gate, company that installed the gate, the movie(s) that did the stunt and the guy that let them get to the front of the line to enable them to ‘ATTEMPT’ to fly.