Okay, I'm embarrassed to ask this Question. I should know by now. Do original Q posts contain "bolded" words like this repost does? The following words are bolded.
[attempt to discredit-cast conspiracy-LARP] and [DANGER], and both are in brackets.
Q posts this out of the blue without any corresponding media article, which is the norm for him.
If the bolded, bracketed words are the message, it sounds like Q may be warning of a "false flag" event intended to be blamed on Q and Q researchers.
p.s. Even if the contains bolding, that may have been the original message at the time too.
What do all ya'll think about this one?
This thread is now retired. Thank you to all who posted and lurked. Click on the image to join us on the new thread.
I think you are in festival
The original drop included bolded text as shown in the repost. But I think that you are right - Q is cautioning that an FF intended to shut down Q access (Twitter, Facebook etc.) by framing the movement is dangerous is in the wind.
3349 and 3127 have bold and brackets in the same place.
-SB
[attempt to discredit-cast conspiracy-LARP] and [DANGER], and both are in brackets.
Original Q post on 8ch was not bolded.
The original post on qanon.pub was bolded?
Here is the same post 3127 on Qmap.pub
It appears the qanon.pub site added the bold, not Q. It may be significant, however, that Q reposted the bolded version?
Concur. Wasn’t there recently an ad for crises actors, I can’t remember if in SanFagsicko or Vegas.