That’s OK. There is no doubt at all that NASA has produced some seriously flawed and outright fraudulent data on GCWC. Prof. James Hansen being one of the main fraudsters there.
OTOH they have produced many studies and data sets that totally contradict the whole phony Climate Hoax. I love bookmarking them and tossing the links at libtards on Youtube and Twitter.
NOAA is the same. Lots of fraud mixed in with actual science they can’t hide. IMO NOAA has more fraud and less science than NASA does FWIW.
My initial reaction was to dismiss it outright since it was NASA, because of their tendency to promote climate change with their data.
I stopped reading anything NOAA produced at least a decade ago. Dry Bulb weather data is about all I look at from them anymore - it’s harder to fudge those numbers even though I wouldn’t put it pass them to prove their point.