The original Woodstock of 1969 was a money-making enterprise from the word go. Any other reading of it is a head-in-the-sand, smiling unicorns, and peace & flowers in the grave fantasy.
Anyone who still believes otherwise is either willfully ignorant or still mentally stuck in the Abbie Hoffman era 60's ... although the latter may accurately describe the state of the current Democratic party ...
/sarc
I like the part where the organizers want the court to order that the company “continue to work” on the festival.
Never seen a liberal turn down a chance to make money....or keep their own money.
Can’t they just “pay for it”?
Re-creating Woodstock is like finding some half-decent Italian-American ballplayer from Staten Island and changing his legal name to Joe DiMaggio.
Fifty years later and Michael Lang is still screwing things up...some things never change.
The concert was a $ flop but the Movie was where the $ was made
“Let It Rot” —The Rutles
Dentsu probably got the estimate for the clean-up AFTER the concert. Besides being an environmental disaster of biblical proportions, the cost would break the bank. And, if it rains like it did in 1969 & 1994...whew...
Michael Lang isnt a good helmsman.
Miami festival
Altamont
Woodstock 69
Woodstock 99