Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/14/2019 12:42:52 PM PDT by Steve1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Steve1999

The Democrats are upset that Trump is challenging their money laundering scheme where tax dollars go to home health workers but then money is siphoned off by the state, handed to SEIU, and then handed to the Democrats.


2 posted on 05/14/2019 12:50:17 PM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

Time for the Administration to seek penalties against CA for filing frivolous lawsuits.


4 posted on 05/14/2019 1:02:32 PM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

“California on Monday filed its 50th lawsuit against the Trump administration in a case challenging a federal rule that bans states from deducting union dues from the paychecks of hundreds of thousands of workers who provide in-home care to low income, disabled and elderly people.”

We have the finest government money can buy.....and often does.


6 posted on 05/14/2019 1:18:13 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

California is not an American state anymore. California is a foreign enemy state.


7 posted on 05/14/2019 1:42:05 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

Why are they suing Trump? This was a Supreme Court decision. I presume I am missing a fundamental thing here.


8 posted on 05/14/2019 1:45:49 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: Can't control their emotions. Can't control their actions. Deny them control of anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

There they go again, people are no longer forced to pay union dues when providing home care in CA, they can still join if they want to, but that’s not good enough for these liberals...Most parents who get IHSS probably don’t want to be paying these dues.


11 posted on 05/14/2019 2:03:03 PM PDT by psjones (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

Is this what the issue is?
>>>
In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled union dues for home health care workers had to be voluntary, meaning unions could not deduct dues from employees who were not members yet were still covered under the collective bargaining agreement. That same year, former President Barack Obama’s administration issued a ruling clarifying states could deduct dues from paychecks of home health care workers who volunteered to join the union.

The Trump administration reversed that rule, arguing it violated federal law that bans states from diverting Medicaid money to third parties, with some exceptions. But Becerra and union leaders said it is designed to weaken the finances of unions by making it harder for people to pay their dues.


12 posted on 05/14/2019 2:08:50 PM PDT by psjones (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

Good use of taxpayer money: waging war against the country’s duly elected government. Is there not one lawyer out there who can see “a pattern of abuse” after 50 lawsuits, and then bring one against these political hacks. And don’t tell me you can’t sue the government!


14 posted on 05/14/2019 2:12:25 PM PDT by I am Richard Brandon ( THE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

Good use of taxpayer money: waging war against the country’s duly elected government. Is there not one lawyer out there who can see “a pattern of abuse” after 50 lawsuits, and then bring one against these political hacks. And don’t tell me you can’t sue the government!


15 posted on 05/14/2019 2:12:25 PM PDT by I am Richard Brandon ( THE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

This is when President Trump should Strike, Formally Demand via a Motion to the Court to have the Case Dismissed and All others with Becerra’s name on them, then file another motion for Sanctions and Demand he be held in Contempt for Perpetrating a Fraud upon the COurt. He is INELIGIBLE per State Law to be Attorney General, appointed or Elected.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/lawsuit-calif-attorney-general-not-eligible-to-hold-office_2921904.html

Legal arguments center around Section 12503 of California’s Government Code, which states, “No person shall be eligible to the office of Attorney General unless he shall have been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the state for a period of at least five years immediately preceding his election or appointment to such office.”


16 posted on 05/14/2019 2:35:14 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999
The Trump administration is simply enforcing the US Supreme Court in the Janus decision.
19 posted on 05/14/2019 5:23:04 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

The 1935 National Labor Relations Act should be ruled unconstitutional and/or repealed so labor unions would lose their immunity to charges of price fixing and/or violations of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.


20 posted on 05/14/2019 6:50:55 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steve1999

IL already lost a case about the same thing.


21 posted on 05/14/2019 6:55:18 PM PDT by marajade (Skywalker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson