Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stunning FBI corruption in Spygate! Read the Kavalec memo
.independentsentinel.com ^ | 5/10/19 | S.Noble

Posted on 05/10/2019 2:34:37 PM PDT by ransomnote

 

The Sentinel reported part of the story of the Kavalec memo May 9th but we have more information now — and it is confirmed. Rep. Mark Meadows confirmed the State Department notes exposing Christopher Steele’s lies and more were transmitted to the FBI before submitting the application for the spy warrant of Carter Page.

The FBI had four pieces of “derogatory information” about Steele from State Department official Kathleen Kavalec: Steele broke his FBI agreement and went to the State Department, he gave State false information, his political deadline was election day, and lastly, he was leaking to The Washington Post and The New York Times.

None of this was ever revealed to the FISA court. Solomon added that the FBI has been stonewalling, trying to block congressional Republicans from the information and the memo.

Solomon says the FBI knew that the State Department official figured out in 45 minutes that Steele lied. She told the FBI. The FBI then pretended for more than two years that they couldn’t figure any of this out.

THE STORY

Ten days before the FBI submitted the infamous Steele dossier to a FISA court as evidence of why it needed a surveillance warrant on Trump’s campaign adviser Carter Page, a State Department official named Kathleen Kavalec raised concerns about the dossier’s legitimacy.

Kavalec, the Assistant Secretary of State, put her concerns in a typed memo and in handwritten notes, investigative reporter John Solomon reported in a piece for The Hill on Thursday.



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: deepstate; fisa; fisagate; kavalec; kavalecmemo; obamasspygate; orbis; peterfritch; peterfritsch; spygate; steele; tatyanaduran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: ransomnote; bitt

you and bitt are all over this one here on fr. (but so where are the never-q-ers? lol)


21 posted on 05/11/2019 6:33:32 PM PDT by SteveH (intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

3/4 is plausible deniability. 4/4 is treason! (imho...)


22 posted on 05/11/2019 6:35:47 PM PDT by SteveH (intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

....hhhmmmmmmmmmm....????

lol!


23 posted on 05/11/2019 6:54:18 PM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!'>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson