Posted on 05/10/2019 10:42:44 AM PDT by ransomnote
EVELYN FARKAS
ADDENDUM PART A
The conversation with Joe and Mika
According to” LeadingAuthorities,”
https://www.leadingauthorities.com/speakers/evelyn-farkas
Dr. Farkas appears regularly as an NBC/MSNBC national security contributor to discuss hot-button geopolitical issues.
LOL! that’s an understatement. The following became quite the hot button issue!
Following is a transcript of the conversation Dr. Farkas had with Joe and Mika which launched the controversy. Did she confirm that spying had been done to the DJT campaign? We know now that really and truly she did.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/03/who-the-hell-is-evelyn-farkas.html
Who the Hell Is Evelyn Farkas?
By OSITA NWANEVU
MARCH 31, 20174:47 PM
Lets start from the beginning. Early this month, the New York Times published a story about Obama administration officials working to preserve and disseminate intelligence about Russian efforts to influence Novembers election across the government before President Obama left office. According to the article, officials were concerned that some of that intelligence, including intercepted communications from Russians detailing contacts with people in Trumps circle and information on Russian meetings with Trump associates, would be covered up or destroyed by the Trump administration.
The day after the story was published, MSNBC analyst and former Obama Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia and Ukraine, Evelyn Farkas appeared on MSNBCs Morning Joe and was asked about the article. Farkas, who left the Obama administration in 2015, told Mika Brzezinski that she had encouraged former colleagues still working in the administration and people on the Hill to take part in the effort to preserve intelligence and intelligence sources:
I was urging my former colleagues and frankly speaking the people on the Hillit was more actually aimed at telling the Hill peopleget as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration. Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people who left. So it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy that the Trump folksif they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff, dealing with Russiansthat they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence.
So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia. So then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to the Hill.
Re-read that transcript. The following is the description of Farkas comments given, weeks after the interview, this Wednesday by Sean Hannity on his radio show:
If they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff, dealing with Russians, they would try to compromise sources and methods [sic]. What are the three big words of the day that I just told you aboutwell, four big words? Surveillance. Unmasking. Intelligence leaks. So shes acknowledging that what Donald Trump tweeted out was correct! So shes acknowledging theres surveillance. Again, I go back, If they knew how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with Russians [sic] so shes acknowledging surveillance, so that means Trumps right. Check that off in the box .
The analysis which continues in the Slate article, as one might expect, is spin. We will look at a better analysis in ADDENDUM Part B
END ADDENDUM PART A
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
:)
EVELYN FARKAS
ADDENDUM PART B
Analysis of the conversation with Joe and Mika
A better analysis can be found regarding Evelyn Farkas remarks to Joe and Mika in this article from Town Hall which can be found here:
Evelyn Farkass Six Revelations about Obama, Trump, and the Deep State
Posted: Apr 02, 2017 12:01 AM
Those six cited items are:
First, Farkas here acknowledges that the Obama administration, essentially, had indeed been gathering intelligence, or spying, on private citizens.
Second, being the Democrat partisan that she obviously is, Farkas intention in making these comments, and making them in the left-friendly venue of MSNBC, was to suggest that the Democrats The Russians Made Us Do It (Lose) narrative has substance.
Yet, notice, Farkas never said that the intel proved anything so much as resembling collusion between Putin or the Russians and Trump. Had there been anything there, she would have done what no one has yet to do and offer at least a scintilla of evidence to substantiate this charge.
Third, in fact, Farkas never even mentions any correspondence between Trump and the Russians. No, she instead references Trump folks and the Trump staff when talking about Russia.
Fourth, while Farkas obviously wanted for audiences to think that Obamas government discovered some nefarious connection between Trump folks and those dastardly Russians, the only allusion that she ever manages to make is to the dealings that she alleges transpired between these groups.
In other words, Farkass wording here is profoundly vague.
Fifth, Farkas unwittingly confesses that she worried about the Trump folks discovering how we knew what we knew . Is it not eminently reasonable to infer from this statement that the how in question, the methods by which intelligence was supposedly gathered, consists of surveillance of the Trump folks?
Finally, Farkas admits to being worried about how the Trump administration would react when it found out how we knew what we knew . Who is this we? Farkas was no longer in the government as of 2015. Yet her choice of words would have us think that she is still very much involved in and allied with bureaucrats in the Deep State. Moreover, given her standing as a Democrat and her position in the Obama administration, its all too sensible to think that Farkas selection of the first person-plural in this context refers to Farkas and her fellow partisans that remain embedded in the bureaucracy over which her former boss presided.
Farkas has tried retreating from her comments. The left-leaning media has been busy spinning them away. But the cat is out of the bag:
The Deep State, under Obama, surveilled American citizens, in this case, Trump and his folks. They wanted the information that they had gathered to be as widely disseminatedleakedas possible.
# # # # # #
So as we band of FReeQs, Anons, Freepers, and Lurks have learned, Evelyn spilled the beans, and perhaps without realizing it, proved that there WAS surveillance. That story was very effectively thrown into the Memory Hole by the MSM. Now that the RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! narrative has collapsed, I am wondering if we will be seeing her again. I hope we do. Can her story be pulled out of the Memory Hole?
In the process of this dig, as noted above, I did find some other interesting stuff, especially in the listings of the Rosenthal bunch and Aspen, but perhaps well call it a day for this particular tunnel.
*texokie packs up her gear, ties up the shovels and puts it all on her back, and finds her way to the exit hole. She makes sure she is wearing the extra jacket Mother of Dragons insisted she wear. She finds the hose, and Mother of Dragons is kind to help her take off said jacket and hose her off. Then she helps her put away the equipment into the Qanteen Qloset . This is no small thing, because Mother of Dragons (and Dragonlets) is the only one who can do that without risking limb and injury. For everyone else, as a routine, it means everything falls on the hapless head (or shovel on shins) of the victim - usually texokie - opening the door. *
End of Five Part dig on Evelyn Farkas, with Addendums A and B
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
you can see this on https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/
see the ID up top circled in red?
Comey is dfeded
https://twitter.com/Speaakn/status/1127757320845504512
https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1127768399721979904
The OIG report is due out by end May or early Jun. DECLAS will likely follow. A couple weeks ago, Joe diGenova said a “bombshell” report on Comey was due out in a couple weeks. Will @RepDougCollins release Comey transcript next wk to coincide w/rpt release?
“C comes before D”
https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1127768399721979904
The OIG report is due out by end May or early Jun. DECLAS will likely follow. A couple weeks ago, Joe diGenova said a “bombshell” report on Comey was due out in a couple weeks. Will @RepDougCollins release Comey transcript next wk to coincide w/rpt release?
“C comes before D”
gisd O
Yeah there are two images in the drop when it first came up only the “q boom” image was visible. After I posted it the “Comey moab” image showed up
My in-laws in PA turned me on to Black Conservative Patriot. Dilley too. Both are non-Q but arrive at the same conclusions as we do. Here’s Dilley and Praying Medic doing a podcast that they videoed together recently. It’s an hour and 17 long though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNLChthsSNs
-SB
> Evelyn Farkas appeared on MSNBCs Morning Joe and was asked about the article. Farkas, who left the Obama administration in 2015, told Mika Brzezinski that she had encouraged former colleagues still working in the administration and people on the Hill to take part in the effort to preserve intelligence and intelligence sources:
I remember this vividly when it happened. And at my age and level of brain cell recycling that is not an easy feat.
-SB
"The Attorney General of Ecuador has agreed to...deliver to the US all his documents, mobile phones, computer files, computers, electronic storage, CDs and any other device "
https://elpais.com/internacional/2019/05/12/actualidad/1557671961_425585.amp.html
I’ve been sitting here trying to figure out how Collins could play into this. Why would Q mention Collins and not this Comey OIG report that DiGenova mentioned.
Collins has been releasing transcripts of closed door testimony sessions so what else can he release?
Is DiGenova blowing smoke up my kilt? Only time will tell.
-SB
My in-laws in PA turned me on to Black Conservative Patriot. Dilley too. Both are non-Q but arrive at the same conclusions as we do. Heres Dilley and Praying Medic doing a podcast that they videoed together recently. Its an hour and 17 long though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNLChthsSNs
-SB
~ ~ ~ ~. ~
AWESOME!! THANKS SO MUCH!
Snowybear to TEXOKIE
> Evelyn Farkas appeared on MSNBCs Morning Joe and was asked about the article. Farkas, who left the Obama administration in 2015, told Mika Brzezinski that she had encouraged former colleagues still working in the administration and people on the Hill to take part in the effort to preserve intelligence and intelligence sources:
I remember this vividly when it happened. And at my age and level of brain cell recycling that is not an easy feat.
-SB
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ROFL!
Are you sure?
p
> Ecuador has agreed to deliver Assange’s goodies to the US
Praying Medic just retweeted it. Hope they leverage him. Either way he’s got a fart sack and vittles for the forseeable future.
-SB
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.