Posted on 05/03/2019 2:26:06 PM PDT by ransomnote
Nadler must have something to hide. What has his wife done? what about his son? Daughter in Law? I am digging, but it’s not my best thing. Help?
Very interesting Malta and John Roberts connections.
good thread on Beck/houses/guns/daughters/etc
https://twitter.com/almostjingo/status/1126299851346440192
Thanks EasySt! I’ve shared this link with friends and family. Sharing link again because I think it is worth watching.
A must watch news video. Note what the reporter says at the end about the students being told “they could find no one to speak”.
Trump reads The Epoch Times every day.
I just read that. I’d like a bit more evidence; he leaves out EU globalist freaks, actual jihad practicing mohammaedans who have been that way for 1400 years nonstop without anyone behind the scenes making them do it, world wide communist movement. The idea if that the CIA were neutered there’d be no more wars is just plain silly.
I am sure much of the details of what he says has truth - like A’stan and herion. But the Taliban were and are real, and have their own agenda.
But I havent decided if hes a derp or just not quick enough to analyze the qualifications she placed on the question. Had he said yes if we were surveilling mobsters or terrorists and followed all procedures I would not call it spying. However, if we were surveilling an opposition political party and did not stick to procedures I would call it spying he would have avoided the sound bite. Some think hes only concerned with protecting the FBI.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A couple of points that put me firmly in the “not a derp” side.
1. Trump can fire him any time he wants.
2. Trump isn’t stupid.
3. Q mentioned him as a good guy.
4. Keeping the other derps in the dark is a huge part of The Plan, including keeping the derps from know the hat color of more than a few important people.
5. The Fake News were all over this trying to convince us all that Wray is a derp. They lie.
My Official Summary. :-)
What is “TDLR”? A person?
Only one Repug wants Don Jr to appear; Sen. Burr. No one else. It’s odd. I read that Don Jr ain’t going.
TLDR or tl;dr = too long, didn’t read
But I don’t think he’s going to give them the unredacted report. He’s made his point about the changing goalposts, now he’s going to exercise his prerogatives as Chief Executive and protect the information - I think they’re taking back the copy that was in the SCIF. Still curious about the Don Jr. subpoena.
Is that John Roberts? Because it looks like John Roberts. Securing the bag.
Then you think about one squad of heavily armed and motivated individuals did in the city of Mumbai a few years ago... skeery.
Dickburr. Yet. Again.
Remember how Graham was generally NoName's doppelganger? Dickburr is Mark Warner's doppelganger. Dickburr's opinion on anything is what Mark Warner tells him it is.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3747912/posts
I was reading the post above about NYT publication of Trump’s tax information.
I agree with the author completely: “has no more right to Trumps tax returns than it has to mine or those of any of you reading these words”
I’m hoping this will be the beginning of an opportunity for Trump to eliminate the IRS and the income tax. Probably a long term goal, but I believe this could be setting the stage for that.
I have long been an advocate of abolishing the income tax and the IRS. I hate paying taxes, but that is the least of my reasons.
#1 on my list is that the IRS is an invasion of privacy. It is none of the government’s dam# business where I work or how much money I make. If you think it is, it’s probably because you have been conditioned to accept that all of your life. As far as i can tell, nothing in the Constitution says that the government has any right to know much of anything about you. Aside from being counted in the census, but I don’t think that requires much invasive information. (FReeQs correct me if I’m wrong here.)
2. The IRS can be (and has been) used as a political weapon, as a means of intimidation.
3. The IRS can completely ruin a person’s life. They have vast powers to confiscate assets and you are guilty until proven innocent. This alone seems to violate every principle of a free country.
4. The complexity of tax law creates a huge burden of time and stress on the middle class. The poor don’t have to deal with this (and may even get a “rebate” on taxes they didn’t pay). The rich can afford to pay someone else to deal with it.
5. Tax laws are specifically designed to stick it to the middle class and/or conservatives. Despite DS/leftwing blather about taxing the rich, it doesn’t really happen unless the rich are hardworking conservatives. Think about it this way - If you are a do-nothing politician, swanning around the world and vacationing at taxpayer expense, staying in the finest hotels, dining in the best restaurants, who gets handed a million bucks (or more) of taxpayer money in bribes/corruption/fake income, you would either have that income hidden under the table or if it were overt (like book deals, do-nothing jobs for your spouse (Mooch), sitting on various boards, speaking fees, etc.) you’d have no problem giving back half or even more. I’ll bet any of you reading this, if you were offered a deal to be handed a million bucks a year with the stipulation that you had to give back half, would be delighted to take the deal. The only problem is that a deal like that with the DS comes with evil strings attached.
6. Income tax penalizes work. Work should be rewarded, not penalized.
7. Income tax penalizes honest people. The criminals lie and avoid the tax.
8. Income tax penalizes citizens. Illegals pay no income tax. Visitors (legal) pay no income tax.
I don’t know what the best solution is, but it is definitely NOT income tax. Of all the options I’ve considered, I think a consumption tax is the most reasonable and the most fair. Everyone who buys anything pays it, whether you’re rich or poor, citizen, visitor, illegal. It doesn’t invade your privacy. So long as the government doesn’t start messing around with creating exemptions for things, it would be hard to use as a weapon. The burden of paperwork would fall on businesses which already have to keep records, so I expect it would not be a great additional burden.
Aha, thanQ, I once knew and forgot.
Flood the state with central americans. Tax, harass, beat, and kill Whites until the rest of them get the he\\ out.
Sorry....I just recalled that Roberts made a visit to Malta.
FReepers, Annons, Autistas and Deplorables are hot on the case.
🚨🚨🚨 IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM TRUMP 🚨🚨🚨
*DO NOT* give your money to the fake MAGA PAC's out there. Give directly to the candidates or to the official campaign orgs. listed here. https://t.co/6rgb6Jn3a1 pic.twitter.com/L02dhW7EZn— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) May 9, 2019
Remember, a certain PAC out there with the words "MAGA" and "Coalition" in it's name siphoned off a cool quarter of a million dollars to hold vanity events where people gave speeches while they handed $60,000 of their donors money to a convicted grifter who defrauded charities.— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) May 9, 2019
THIS time around as we gear up for 2020 & Trump's crucial reelection campaign, let's make every dollar count.
Give your money directly to MAGA candidates or to the official campaign fundraising organizations.— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) May 9, 2019
The Tea Party got looted blind, I watched it happen.
In 2010 the grifters were caught flat footed, they missed the wave of Tea Party $$$ but they VOWED that wouldn't happen again, and by 2012 they were ready to catch the wave with their fake Tea Party PACS.— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) May 9, 2019
Trump is aware there are a LOT of fake MAGA PACs out there and he is putting the word out that people need to be CAREFUL where they donate their money.
Most PACs only pass on around 10%, if that, to candidates running for office. The rest goes for salaries, travel, etc.— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) May 9, 2019
If you look at a PAC's internals and over 90% of their donations go for salaries, travel, fundraising advertising, hotel stays, and waaaay down there at the bottom you find they finally get around to passing about 10% on to candidates running for office, what does that tell you?— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) May 9, 2019
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.