Posted on 05/01/2019 7:20:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
My grandmother cooked in her kitchen on a wood-burning stove until, at 92 years of age, she passed away. Wood stove technology is not as simple as some people think. We may have to learn it all over again. Here is why:
I recently read an online article about something called 5G and became aware that this innovation will potentially enable any large government, our own or our adversaries, to spy, hack, sabotage or otherwise wreak havoc on the entire world infrastructure of communication and security. This is not hyperbole. It is as real as nuclear bombs, and if not as destructive, it poses almost as deadly a threat. Indeed, the 5G cyber-war might well spark a nuclear conflagration.
The network on which cell phones operate is being upgraded. That innovation will, as they say, usher in a new age of vast potential. It can also be weaponized against us. An enemy could plunge us back into the dark ages.
Is this for real? Apparently, very serious authorities are concerned. The biggest internet tech companies are already accruing surveillance powers that rival those of our own government, and in all likelihood, exceed them. Worse yet, many of those companies are hostile to our nation, refusing to assist our military, while eagerly aiding the foreign dictatorships that threaten our freedoms.
It is difficult to state the problem without sounding like chicken-little, or like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D), who claims that the world will end in twelve years.
It may, but not because of climate-change, which we cannot remedy, but because China's dictator-for-life is methodically developing the technological power to dictate to the world. If he succeeds, the world may not end, but it may as well.
At or near the center of this geopolitical storm is the Chinese company called Huawei.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The key question is this -— Does Huawei marches in lock-step with the Chinese Communist Party, their military, political and police-state apparatus?
If so, we ought to be extra careful. Huawei manufactures the hardware that enables the 5G network to operate.
Intentionally built in to that hardware could be Trojan Horses, the ability to spy, to monitor, and indeed, even to hack into our most secret agencies.
If we are not careful, this technology can sabotage our systems, for example, at a critical moment, by “turning off” our ability to communicate between our agencies, including our military units worldwide.
Next question -— Huawei denies any intention, or any ability, to do this. CAN THEY BE TRUSTED?
From what I have read, Huawei is, for all intents and purposes, owned by the Chinese military.
It’s true that cameras and microphones can be very tiny and cheap, and connecting them wirelessly into a network is also cheap. Yes the final result is that we’re being watched and listened to more and more.
And there’s facial recognition, and possibly voice recognition.
And our personal devices are running software that can have all sorts of bad things hidden in it.
The guy has a point.
Yes it is.
RE: Yes it is.
Can you elaborate for our education? Thanks.
This author is not rational or knowledgeable in the subject he writes about.
Hell, he even admits he “recently read an article”. That’s funny right there, I don’t care who you are.
The answer is yes !
Foreign companies in China are required to turn over their technology in order to conduct business in China.
They also have installed a 30 year plan, and anticipate becoming world dominate 'Super power', replacing the USA by 2030.
Business corporations and politics are all one in China; they are inseparable.
Huawei is excluded from any US comms infrastructure and we’re in the process of apply great pressure on all allies to do the same.
They are but ONE 5G manufacturer of at least 10.
“I recently read an online article about something called 5G”
Something called 5G? Where ya been buddy?
I would venture a guess that this writer is not an expert on these matters.
So, the bottom line question is still this -— SHOULD WE BE CONCERNED ABOUT HUAWEI 5G EQUIPMENT? Or can we happily purchase them for our 5G communications?
So, GOPe, how is that Free-Trade Offshoring thing working out for ya?
Again HUAWEI is excluded, by the FCC and Commerce, from all US Communications infrastructure.
No US company has the option of implementing their equipment.
Part of the way 5G works is with microcells (it is fast enough that distance from the cell makes a notable difference in latency, so cells are close together) which increase the number of connections by more than a factor of 10, which means that the connection to each cellular device has to be tuned by azimuth - horizontal and vertical - to aim the signal beams, and by distance to adjust the power.
Just to use its basic functionality, the 5G network will not only know which tower you are attached to, but the exact direction, elevation, and distance to the connected device, making triangulation unnecessary.
It is far too late to put all these genies back in their bottles.
True privacy cannot exist in the digital age, unless you go full Amish.
Countermeasures will always need to be developed and in development, but it will be like the evolution of predators and prey in the great savannahs of Africa.
I tried to post it here as a thread but The New Yorker is completely off-limits, even in excerpt form.
This article is cited at the source.
I’m more worried about the asteroid that’s gonna swing by the Earth in 2029.
The Chinese Tortoise and the American Hare
By David P. Goldman April 29, 2019
Here are my remarks at the New York conference of the Committee on the Present Danger in New York City. I spoke on a panel with Steve Bannon, Roger Robinson, Kyle Bass and Gordon Chang, chaired by Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy.
Historian Andrew Roberts reports that Winston Churchill said just after Pearl Harbor that “in the event of war, the Japanese would ‘fold up like the Italians,’ because they were ‘the wops of the Far East.’” The West chronically underestimates Asians, as the Russians found out at Port Arthur, the Americans at Pearl Harbor and the Yalu River, the British at Singapore, and so forth.
A case in point is the present tariff war. The U.S. assumed that tariffs on Chinese imports would force China to make fundamental concessions to American trade demands. On January 6, President Donald Trump said, “China’s not doing very well now. It puts us in a very strong position. We are doing very well.” Since then China’s CSI 300 stock index has gained 37% during 2019 to date, double the gain in U.S. stock markets. China’s economic growth has accelerated while America’s has slowed. The tariff war may have hurt the U.S. economy more than China’s. With an internal market of 1.4 billion people, China can replace lost foreign business by increasing internal demand. Ten years ago exports made up 36% of China’s gross domestic product versus only 18% today. World trade is shrinking, but the impact on China is manageable.
I support President Trump. I applaud him for calling attention to China’s challenge to America’s strategic position. But I have warned from the outset that the tools he has employed won’t get the results he wants.
Early in 2018, the United States banned exports of U.S. components to the Chinese telecommunications equipment maker ZTE, which violated U.S. sanctions on Iran. Huawei, the dominant Chinese telecom equipment maker, undertook a crash program to devise substitutes for the U.S. chips that power Chinese-made handsets, and achieved self-sufficiency as of December 2018. Now a Japanese study reports that Huawei’s handset chips are equal to or better than Apple’s.
America’s campaign to persuade its allies to keep Huawei away from the rollout of 5G (fifth generation) mobile data networks has failed. Britain, Germany, Italy, Malaysia, Thailand, India, South Korea and the whole of Eastern Europe have rejected American demands. This was a sadly foreseeable diplomatic disaster. Huawei is the highest-quality as well as the lowest-cost provider of 5G systems. It spends US$20 billion a year on research and development, double the combined outlay of its two largest competitors, Nokia and Ericsson. Half of Huawei’s workforce is engaged in R&D, including thousands of European engineers.
Cisco used to dominate the market for mobile data systems. It currently has $72 billion of cash in the bank, roughly what Huawei spent on R&D during the past seven years. The question is: Why do Chinese companies invest while American companies hoard?
The Asian model treats capital-intensive industry as infrastructure. It supports chip foundries with public funds the way we Americans subsidize airports or sports arenas
To paraphrase Leon Trotsky, you may not be interested in industrial policy, but industrial policy is interested in you. The Asian model treats capital-intensive industry as infrastructure. It supports chip foundries with public funds the way we Americans subsidize airports or sports arenas. The Asian model begins with Japan’s Meiji Restoration in 1868. China’s model is a variant of the Asian model, which Deng Xiaoping adopted with the advice of Lee Kuan Yew, in explicit emulation of Singapore.
China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan subsidize capital-intensive industry, with the result that virtually all of the high-tech products invented in America are now manufactured in Asia. Liquid-crystal displays, light-emitting diodes, semiconductor lasers, and solid-state sensors are produced almost exclusively in Asia. America’s share of semiconductor manufacturing fell from 25% in 2011, to less than 10% in 2018. Silicon is to the weapons of the 21st century what steel was to the 19th century. A country that cannot produce its own integrated circuits cannot defend itself.
China is outspending the U.S. in quantum computing, including $11 billion to build a single research facility in Hefei. By contrast, the U.S. allocated $1.2 billion for quantum computing over the next five years. Overall, federal development funding in the U.S. has fallen from 0.78% of GDP in 1988 to 0.39% in 2016.
China remains behind the U.S. in most key areas of technology, but it is catching up fast. In the last several years China has
Landed a probe on the dark side of the moon;
Developed successful quantum communication via satellite;
Built a 2,000-kilometer quantum communication network between Beijing and Shanghai;
Built missiles that can blind American satellites;
Developed surface-to-ship missiles that can destroy any vessel within hundreds of miles of its coast; and
Built some of the world’s fastest supercomputers.
China’s investment in education parallels its investment in the high-tech industry. Today China graduates four times as many STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) bachelor’s degrees as the U.S. and twice as many doctoral degrees, and China continues to gain. A third of Chinese students major in engineering, vs 7% in the U.S. Eighty percent of U.S. doctoral candidates in computer science and electrical engineering are foreign students, of whom Chinese are the largest contingent. Most return to China. The best U.S. universities have trained top-level faculty for Chinese universities. American STEM graduate programs reported a sharp fall in foreign applications starting in 2017, partly because Chinese students no longer have to come to the U.S. for a world-class education.
China’s household consumption has risen 17-fold since 1986 and its GDP in U.S. dollars has risen 35-fold. China has moved 550 million people from countryside to city in only 40 years, the equivalent of Europe’s population from the Urals to the Atlantic. China has built the equivalent of all the cities in Europe to house the new urban dwellers, as well as 80,000 miles (nearly 130,000 kilometers) of superhighway and 18,000 miles (29,000km) of high-speed trains.
China’s debt-to-GDP ratio stands at 253% (47% government, households 50%, corporate 155%). That is about the same as America’s 248% (98% to government, households 77%, corporate 74%). The high corporate debt number is due to the fact that state-owned enterprises fund a great deal of infrastructure, building with debt that is counted as corporate rather than government. China’s debt problem is no worse than ours.
China’s Belt and Road Initiative intends to Sinify the economies of the Global South, from Malaysia and Indonesia to Mexico and Brazil. Huawei often is the spearhead of the BRI, building mobile broadband networks that prepare the ground for Chinese e-commerce and e-finance companies. China wants to integrate the labor of countries with a total population of 2 billion into its economic sphere.
It is fanciful to believe that any kind of American pressure can destabilize, let alone dislodge, the present regime within any calculable time horizon. But we can regain technological leadership and prove the superiority of our way of life, and degrade the credibility of the Chinese Communist Party over time. China can innovate, but we can innovate much better. We need to return with a vengeance to the strategies that won the Cold War.
Solutions include:
Forcing key high-tech industries onshore using defense subsidies/tax breaks
Placing export controls on high tech (no more Boeing satellites to help China surveil its citizens)
Change Defense Department budget priorities to emphasize war-winning advance technologies rather than legacy systems
A new National Defense Education Act
Create an alternative to the Belt and Road Initiative with Japan, South Korea, India and others
Engineer a brain drain of China’s most talented scientific cadre.
https://pjmedia.com/spengler/the-chinese-tortoise-and-the-american-hare/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.