“We have Trump for president, and that says a lot," Ehlers said. "That shows a disrespect in this country for women at a lot of different levels. I think we need to address that first before a woman can win."
“We have Trump for president, and that says a lot," Ehlers said. "That shows a disrespect in this country for women at a lot of different levels. I think we need to address that first before a woman can win."
You need a cuck like Jeb Bush or Mitt Romney in order for a woman to beat him.
If they can’t handle debating President Trump how are they going to handle dealing with Putin or Kim Jong Un or President Xi of China?
If any Democrat beats Trump after the temper tantrum they put on over the past 2+ years, then this country will deserve everything that will happen to it.
A woman could defeat Trump, but a communist cannot. The 20 vermin in the “democrat” field are all reds.
Yes, it’s worth the risk.
Honestly, this is so silly.
A strong Margaret Thatcher-type woman could run for president and win. A strong intelligent capable woman who has the makings to be a good president would acquit herself well even if she loses; because a strong intelligent capable candidate of either sex is, among other many other things, a good sport.
But I doubt anyone could defect Pres. Trump, certainly these fools — female or male!
The deep state has chosen a known and completely bought candidate in the form of slo joe. They and their mockingbirds are clearing the field.
They believe a woman can’t take on Trump and win, but we’re the sexists?
These people really need to step back and just listen to themselves.
No one can beat Trump. They might as well jump into a wood-chipper.
The interesting question to me is, who will the Dem loser be?
If it’s a crazy from the far Left, than the old-school Dems have a chance to blame extremism and pull back from the Edge.
If it’s old-school, like Biden or Hitlery, then it’s Over-the-Edge in 2024.
Either way, after 2020, it’s “ours” to lose.
The winner, Sniffer Joe will have Hillary or The Wookiee as his VP ,LOL
Really? As nasty, say, as you made it for Sarah Palin? That nasty?
Wtf? Women can’t run because they might be running against a womanizer? STEP UP. JEEZ. Dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.
You idiot D women! Every woman in the last 200 years who accomplished ANYTHING had to run the gauntlet of sexism in many ways. Big whoop. Do it or shut up.
Trump will just grab a female candidate by her polls.
Anybody notice the usual lefty BS tropes in this article?
Mrs. Clinton’s loss is blamed on misogyny.
No mention of her legendary corruption. The logic of these people is insane. Americans rejected her because of her _policies_, her corruption, etc, not because she is a Vagina-American. She called more than half of the entire country irredeemable, arguably worse than “deplorable”, that received the headlines. This notion that since I won’t vote for a corrupt carpet-bagger lefty hag means I hate women or something like that is BS.
Good try, though.
Identity politics is pure poison. Articles like this just show why.
Democrats are delusional again, as usual.
Trump made promises and he is delivering on those promises.
I think and hope people can see that and will reelect him by an overwhelming margin.
With the current crop of women running for President, the idea of having a woman as President could be set back years, if not decades.
Democrat message to women:
“we’ll take your money and your votes, but don’t bother applying as a candidate”
(this is how they’re going to get independents?)
Let me save you a little time:
The Democrats will do anything, abandon any principle, stab any ally in the back, and do incalculable damage to the country, as long as they win.
There is no such thing as a Democrat Party principle. It is, and always has been, about naked power. Politics is just something they say to gain power.