Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

The sample dates from approximately 1,500 years ago.

I would argue that 500 AD is not “cave man” time frame. This would be more “native American”.


7 posted on 04/24/2019 12:33:24 PM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol

What, you don’t think some Indians lived in caves? Maybe he was a homeless Indian.


21 posted on 04/24/2019 12:43:44 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

Well, it was found in a ‘cave’....................


23 posted on 04/24/2019 12:45:12 PM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

“I would argue that 500 AD is not “cave man” time frame.”

It all depends on what part of the world we are talking about. 2019 AD is still “cave man” time for some people.


65 posted on 04/24/2019 2:20:09 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol
"This would be more “native American”."

Yup. No horses yet either.

66 posted on 04/24/2019 2:26:29 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson