Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump says there was 'illegal spying' on his campaign after Barr backs off explosive claim
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-says-there-was-illegal-spying-on-his-campaign-after-barr-backs-off-expl ^ | 11 April 2019 | Yahoo! News

Posted on 04/13/2019 9:11:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

President Trump said Thursday that he agrees with Attorney General William Barr’s explosive, since-clarified assertion that he believes the FBI was “spying” on Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.

“I think what he said was absolutely true — there was absolutely spying into my campaign,” Trump told reporters inside the Oval Office before a bilateral meeting with South Korean President Moon Jae-in. “I’ll go a step further: It was illegal spying, unprecedented spying. And something that should never be allowed to happen in our country again. And I think his answer was a very accurate one.”

On Wednesday, Barr touched off a firestorm during a hearing on Capitol Hill, saying he believes “spying did occur” in the federal investigation into the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia while defending his review of the probe.

By the end of the hearing, though, he backed off his explosive claim.

“I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal,” Barr said during testimony before the Senate Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies subcommittee.

“Spying” is a pejorative term not normally used to describe domestic counterintelligence investigations.

“I think spying did occur,” he said. “The question was whether it was adequately predicated. And I’m not suggesting it wasn’t predicated. I need to explore that.”

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: dylanstableford; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Because "unauthorized surveillance" isn't "spying?"
1 posted on 04/13/2019 9:11:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Im not aware that legitimate spying is a “pejorative term”.


2 posted on 04/13/2019 9:13:16 AM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Do not tell me Barr is a weakling, too.


3 posted on 04/13/2019 9:13:58 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Dylan Stableford

Senior Trump hater and fake news journalist at Yahoo News

https://twitter.com/stableford


4 posted on 04/13/2019 9:14:30 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
He "backed off" to the extent that he offered one Democrat the concession that the word "surveillance" might be used interchangeably with the word "spying."

AFAIK, that's the only aspect of his testimony that he "backed off" on.

5 posted on 04/13/2019 9:16:25 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Not sure where he’s (Barr) backing off his claim


6 posted on 04/13/2019 9:17:13 AM PDT by frogjerk (We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Only those who have drunk the kool-aid exploded, on the of course. Normal Americans figured it out a long time ago.


8 posted on 04/13/2019 9:19:08 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

I’m giving Barr the benefit of the doubt in his phrasing. Remember, he’s overseeing the INVESTIGATIVE phase, and even though the spying against Trump happened, Barr has to use the “alleged” terminology and phrasing in formal or official capacity until such evidence is formalized and presented for indictment to a grand jury.

So far, Barr has been on track with playing a fair hand with regard to this most outrageous domestic coup attempt in American history. There may be a time where he will go John Roberts on us, but based on his actions, and Trump’s learning curve of being able to pick personnel not tied to the swamp, I feel a bit more confident than I did a month ago.


9 posted on 04/13/2019 9:20:40 AM PDT by GOP Congress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Everybody knows "unauthorized surveillance" isn't "spying."

</sarcasm>

10 posted on 04/13/2019 9:20:52 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Capitalism produces EVERYTHING Socialists/Communists/Democratic-Socialists wish to "redistribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Idiot newsies at Yah-effin-hoo say Barr backed off.

Bull Schiff.


11 posted on 04/13/2019 9:23:38 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Everybody knows "unauthorized surveillance" isn't "spying."

Exactly, the same way "gross negligence" in handling top secret material is a crime, but "extreme carelessness" is not.

12 posted on 04/13/2019 9:25:06 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: madison10

The only weaklings here are people who trust yahoo news spin on Barr’s testimony


13 posted on 04/13/2019 9:33:31 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Barr did not back off of his claim one bit. He rephrased it and made the question appear stupid. This is a VERY misleading headline, but we should expect no less.

There should be an extremely high bar for any surveillance of a campaign and CLEARLY it was not only unfounded, but there was no predicate crime given that Page was not charged. It was not only the FISA surveillance. The rampant unmasking of NSA data as well as the unfettered access by persons conducting oppo research (Fusion GPS/Nellie Ohr) was illegal and a clear violation of the 4th and 5th amendment.

It also appears quite possible that Papadopolous might have been the subject of a FISA warrant. This is very alarming given that it appears our intel and the 5 eyes group conducted a push-pull effort to entrap him. Bet that was not mentioned in the FISA application on him either.

This is serious stuff that should concern every American.


14 posted on 04/13/2019 9:34:24 AM PDT by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
"Not sure where he’s (Barr) backing off his claim"

Nope! He didn't. That is FAKE NEWS!

15 posted on 04/13/2019 9:34:56 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Barr didn’t back off. He is after all investigating


16 posted on 04/13/2019 9:37:54 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10
"Do not tell me Barr is a weakling, too."

Read the article. I saw nothing in it, not a quote or anything where Barr backed off, or attempted to back off his original comment. Just journalistic wishful thinking.

17 posted on 04/13/2019 9:39:02 AM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madison10

No. Listen or watch the hearing. He is answering in a lawyerly specific way to the questions asked. He still thinks there was spying


18 posted on 04/13/2019 9:39:12 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wow. This guy is a regular on here.

http://freerepublic.com/tag/dylanstableford/index


19 posted on 04/13/2019 9:39:27 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
after Barr backs off explosive claim

He was just mocking the cornered slathering RAT.

So far, I really like this guy.

20 posted on 04/13/2019 9:41:02 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (The Obama is about to hit the fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson