Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ultra-fast air-breathing rocket engine moves a step closer
CNN ^ | 8th April 2019 | Jack Guy,

Posted on 04/08/2019 7:06:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin

Fans of supersonic flight have been yearning for a new way to break the sound barrier ever since Concorde stopped flying in 2003.

Now successful tests of a key part of an air-breathing rocket engine may have brought that dream a step closer to reality.

UK company Reaction Engines announced successful tests of a precooler on Monday, simulating conditions at Mach 3.3, or more than three times the speed of sound.

That's more than 50% faster than the cruising speed of Concorde -- which used to make the journey between New York and Paris in around 3.5 hours -- and matches the speed record of the fastest jet aircraft ever made, the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird.

The precooler tests were part of the company's plans to develop the Synergetic Air-Breathing Rocket Engine (SABRE) engine and took place at a testing facility at the Colorado Air and Space Port in the United States.

At such high speeds, air flowing through the engine can reach incredibly high temperatures, which can potentially cause damage.

A precooler reduces the temperature of gases before they enter the core engine itself.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: sabre; sabreengine; spaceplane
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: OftheOhio

The thermal gradients alone on those heat exchanger elements are very high. Tough to manage those thermal stresses and avoid cracking that would leak hydrogen.


21 posted on 04/08/2019 9:56:43 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I’ve got a lot of faith in these UK guys though. They’ve been at it awhile.


22 posted on 04/08/2019 10:18:10 PM PDT by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan; BobL
‘Recent tests prove that the component can cool gases from over 1,000 Celsius to ambient temperature in less than 1/20th of a second,

Common metals and alloys could not handle that kind of thermal stress. They must be using some exotic material to that kind of rapid temperature gradient.

I work in the electric power industry and we have strict heat up and cool down rates to prevent exceeding thermal stress limits.

That kind of cool down rate wouldn’t even be possible in our condenser. But of course, we don’t have liquid hydrogen or oxygen flowing through our tubes.

23 posted on 04/09/2019 2:13:32 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Spacetrucker

It’s U.K. not US. And while brits have their own national security interests; if Brexit ever does happen, such technology would be of enormous economic benefit.


24 posted on 04/09/2019 3:03:54 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Terrorist

Yea, and it’s fuel tanks leaked like a sieve on the ground until it got airborne and up to speed. And it needed special JP fuel with a really high ignition temp.


25 posted on 04/09/2019 3:06:50 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

Isn’t this a scram jet?


26 posted on 04/09/2019 6:01:45 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Trump is the best project/program/portfolio manager in the world!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Wonder what the un-simplified version looks like... ;)


27 posted on 04/09/2019 6:11:13 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

No, a sramjet uses supersonic air for compression. Blackbird is more of a ramjet. Those spikes at the front of the nacelles along with by-pass doors, manage the SS airflow to bring it subsonic for the turbine to compress before combustion.


28 posted on 04/09/2019 6:39:15 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

Nvermind. I was talking the 71 and you were talking about the new engine.

I havent delved into yet. Been busy.


29 posted on 04/09/2019 6:40:44 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Terrorist

The SR 71 increased about a foot in length at top speed, which created many problems.

That’s why it was skinned in titanium, too. At rest, on the runway, there were gaps in the skin. Some big enough you can put your fingers through.

“Sled Driver” from Brian Shul is an awesome look at what it takes to drive an SR-71.

I found it in PDF format, online, 2 years or so ago. Let me know if you want a link.


30 posted on 04/09/2019 8:07:43 AM PDT by ro_dreaming (Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

After reading everything again, I have come to the conclusion that the inlet is blocked off entirely before it ever gets into the transition phase, the precooler would otherwise be destroyed.


31 posted on 04/09/2019 8:16:30 AM PDT by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OftheOhio

That would be the blocker door to the precooler/compressor. The inlet portion to the ramjet would remain open.


32 posted on 04/09/2019 8:31:03 AM PDT by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Thanks for the article. This is an excellent explanation of a combined cycle engine.


33 posted on 04/09/2019 8:35:39 AM PDT by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ro_dreaming

Sure, send it along. The SR 71 is one of the most fascinating planes of all time.

Of course, the most beautiful plane ever built is the Boeing 747.


34 posted on 04/09/2019 8:53:10 AM PDT by Tea Party Terrorist (A bad peace is better than a good war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Terrorist

https://www.dropbox.com/s/d2obrrulsyk90dd/Sled%20Driver%20%28Shul%29.pdf?dl=0

I was a fan of the SR-71, and the YF-12. To me, combined with the B-1 (Bone), and the B-2 Spirit, are the prettiest birds in the air.


35 posted on 04/09/2019 9:21:41 AM PDT by ro_dreaming (Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ro_dreaming

There’s also a declassified Blackbird flight manual out there that makes for a very interesting read.


36 posted on 04/09/2019 10:40:18 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
"They must be using some exotic material to that kind of rapid temperature gradient."


37 posted on 04/09/2019 10:48:53 AM PDT by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I hope they do not make the mistake of Boeing and Airbus with their faulty sensors or this plane will hit the earth at mach 3.3


38 posted on 04/09/2019 11:05:53 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spacetrucker

“Note: Mach 25 is orbital, thus not reacting with atmospheric friction in the same way.”

Not really true. Re-entry conditions are Mach 25, 180 db, and 3000 degress f. Look at some pictures of the bottom of space shuttles. That must have been a wild ride back into the atmosphere even if it only lasted a couple of minutes.


39 posted on 04/10/2019 3:01:42 AM PDT by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OftheOhio

Noted. Though full speed of a Mach 25 range, would not last the entire re-entry period, would it?


40 posted on 04/10/2019 4:59:02 AM PDT by Spacetrucker (George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson