It did sound like a clumsy bust at best. Technically legal, the prevention action could have gone down with far more grace, if authorities knew that one club was out to get another club at the Twin Peaks meeting. The idea would be to keep either club from fighting, not to wade into the melee themselves.
The clubs were not at the restaurant to ‘get’ anyone. They were meeting up to make sure that no violence would occur between the groups.
Seems the police snipers were disappointed when no one was giving them a pretext to open fire so they took it upon themselves to start the shooting.
See, the big problem these (low IQ) geniuses with badges did not consider is that the bikers were armed with pistols while the kill shots were made with rifles.
None of the evidence then pointed at any of the accused.
Now they want the case to go away because the evidence points at the only people who had rifles that day: the police.
Seems more like the kind of premeditated murder that could be arranged by a payment of sufficient size by one of the rivals to the “law enforcement” decision-maker. What better way to take out a gang rival than have the cops do it?
Withholding medical care after the scene was secured until people bleed out is “technically legal” in your view?
You never bothered to read the early reporting when they interviewed people whose phones were confiscated and erased, now did you.
There is a reason the Government refused to the end to provide video recordings from the black boxes they set up in the parking lot as required by the Brady Law. Even tho having been caught not providing that footage caused the early convictions to be tossed out.
This wasn’t “technically legal.”