Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: centurion316

Again, I’m really enjoying your posts & this thread as a whole.
You say’ “patronizing is a good choice of word to characterise the attitude of white society, especially among the women.”

That comment touches on other complex issues WRT the peculiar institution.
White Christian women married to plantation owners had to produce an heir or two, then feign a ladylike disinterest in sex, while pretending not to notice the strong resemblance to her husband & sons all the light-skinned little “pickanninnies” on the plantatation bore.
The white women knew the slave women were attracting their husbands’ attention & even genuine affection in some instances.
The offspring of these liasons were more likely to be freed, not only because they were part white, but to get rid of them, lest they try and claim any inheritance.
So, yes, I’d agree, patronizing/ condescension does aptly characterise even the more compassionate treatment of slaves by their white masters.


31 posted on 03/30/2019 7:29:38 PM PDT by mumblypeg (I've seen the future, brother. It is murder. --L. Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: mumblypeg
The white women knew the slave women were attracting their husbands’ attention & even genuine affection in some instances.

Bear in mind, after the importation of slaves was outlawed in 1808 by President Jefferson many years before the Civil War, many slaveowners became personally involved in producing more slaves. There was an economic rationale behind immoral behavior.

35 posted on 03/30/2019 7:56:23 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (In war, there can be no substitute for victory. --Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson