I was thinking about the Sarah Sanders clip last night, the one where she says that working for a foreign government against the US was treason. I posted that my immediate thought was setting up 44 (and I still think it is), but what if the more immediate reason for that was to set up some revelations about no name? That makes sense to me since no name was suddenly in the news again.
I think it’s applicable but I think the reason no name was in the news was because of the release of testimony that proved he was the one designated to take the “dossier” to [JC] & then the media needed to obfuscate that by blasting POTUS for saying anything negative without reporting what no name had done.
No name just pops up because the fake news media WILL not stop asking him about it.
I gotta vent. Rush was talking the other day and he was talking about President Trump’s original sin of saying he liked the heroes better that DIDN’T get caught, and completely ignored that Dear Leader had only made those remarks because no name had just insulted US, calling us whacko birds or something. He’s a counterpuncher. Don’t want none, don’t start none.