Posted on 03/16/2019 9:00:44 PM PDT by bitt
The Murdoch-owned Fox News network has decided to shelve Judge Jeanine Pirros television show this week, after Pirro questioned Islams compatibility with the U.S. Constitution in a segment on Democrat congresswoman Ilhan Omar, an avowed anti-Semite.
Variety reports: Fox News Channel replaced tonights broadcast of Jeanine Pirros weekly program with a repeat episode of its documentary series Scandalous, just days after the 21st Century Fox-owned cable-news network said it condemned remarks the outspoken host made about Minnesota Democrat Ihan Omar.
Fox News did not choose to provide an explanation to Variety for their report.
This should tell you everything you need to know about the Fox News corporation
We watched as Fox News has blatantly lied about our reporting. We watched Shep Smith go to the Left of Hugo Chavez. We listened to hours of garbage pointless manipulated talking points from anti-Trump former colonels and many other grifters who shill their books. But its time to wake up to what Fox News is doing. They are not on the American peoples side. (READ: If Neocon Fox News Dares To Mess With Tucker, They Will Be Declaring War Against America First).
(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...
OANN is kinda old school/low tech production with one camera shots, blunt cuts and some cell video or skype interviews, but that’s fine as the content & reporting is solid.
might need your advice on cable cutting/roku down the road. got upward billing creep from DTV
ATT uverse has OAN (1208).
Uh oh. Thanks for that information.
A shit-ton of makeup and a push-up bra combined with friendly lighting will do that....
Thanks for that info.
They are another provider in our area.
Not sure why Comcast/Xfinity wont add OAN. :-(
Hubby refuses (for now) to cut the cable cord. Even my sisters ATT tech/installer guy says he only streams, now.
Fox has been dead to me for quite some time now.
The simple general reality is there are left and right news streams of separate and competing dominance.
Cable and Internet.
There are two groups of participants:
Producers and consumers.
Here at FR we are consumers of mostly internet news streams including social media. Those of us who are still connected by Cable (myself not included) are participating in a declining news stream and the conservative dimension of this declining news stream is vanishing faster than the general decline.
Still the Cable news, although declining, is a loud ‘megaphone’ for the left. Their cable markets blast their message through most of the ‘urban archipelago’ as the left likes to call it.
Recently, a news article reported that 90% of cable subscription revenues were supporting news productions viewed by only 1% of subscribers. The cable companies support the left because they are owned by wealthy persons who the left caters to and for which the left is a means of control. We know that already.
Should a conservative investment group consider a new cable outlet? No. It’s a declining market and the market is very, very difficult to gain a foothold.
I remember when Fox News Sunday started in 1996 with host Tony Snow. The Fox News Channel had to battle for every inch of space inside cable markets.
To repeat what the old conservative Fox stalwarts did years ago is a no-go. It makes no sense.
The new development is 24/7 Internet.
But as many of us who study the business end of Internet production know, there is a battle raging. The left is not winning yet but they sure as hell are fighting like mad. Witness the ignominious disgusting Bill Maher expand into the internet realm through Amazon:
https://www.today.com/popculture/bill-maher-takes-politics-internet-wbna13424372
Today.com, a part of the leftist stable, is promoting his entry onto the internet stage amidst his declining HBO cable program.
And note, Amazon is CIA just as conservatives are learning Facebook is CIA. What is meant here? It means the international CIA teamed with MI6 and others are the marketing and enforcement arms of central bankers who in turn are a select group of persons. Whether or not you believe this, just note it for now and let the facts weigh in over time. It may take a week, a month, several years, but eventually it comes into sharp focus.
Next, note the internet is a decentralized business model for now and the left ALWAYS centralizes everything. That is one of their prime vulnerabilities.
Conservatives have the dominant viewpoints and demographic presence but they are continually squelched by what the left’s money spigots can buy which originate ultimately from central banking in off-ledger funding (digitally created from keyboards) through a number of fronts. So they have the money, that’s a given. That may sound like a lot of conspiracy hooey but it’s not. They have the money or equivalently, Conservatives don’t have the money, more precisely, Conservatives don’t have their money.
But wars are not always won by using someone else’s form of money. Another form of compensation and incentive needs to be devised.
George Washington didn’t have enough money to defeat the British. He used land grants to pay his soldiers. He had been a land surveyor and when deployed during the French and Indian War to the ‘Wilderness’ now known as the Midwest, he surveyed the land. These land tracts were granted when he was General of the Continental Army to his officers and soldiers. They were recorded in Christian parishes and are still used to this day by genealogists to trace family migrations.
What do Conservatives have to compensate themselves, to pay their bills as they shift from consumer to producer?
* Willpower
* Retirement pensions
* Inheritance
* Loans
Add to the list.
Conservative producers would target internet markets. For that, they need some capital and a business plan. That’s feasible. Capital for shoe-string operations can be raised but capital to take and control markets with a conservative message will likely need to be made mostly of market shares however devised.
And what would conservatives need to get started?
That would be outlined in the business plan.
Here’s a tool that allows a conservative broadcaster to get started from home:
How to Become a DJ From Your Computer
https://deals.newatlas.com/sales/mixvibes-dj-software-bundle?utm_source=StackSocial+Deals+Newsletter&utm_campaign=20190317_Tech_DailyDeals_18193_remixlive_a0x1P000003YbeR&utm_medium=email
Needless to say, any conservative who would embark on a mission such as this will need to devote themselves 24/7. If they are married, they will create a computer widow/widower unless their spouse is their partner in this.
But the first step for any such endeavor is to get talking about it.
thanx for the heads up
ATT UVERSE has to be already prewired underground in your area. ATT will know. My BIL has Direct TV through ATT at 3 houses. I can ask if he has it.
DirectTV NOW (their streaming package) has OAN also.
TY
They are apologists for muslims just like CNN.
Definition of apologist
: one who speaks or writes in defense of someone or something
We are heading into our 3rd year of cutting our cable.
Tv seldom comes on until about dinner time and off again about 9 pm.
No fake news (national or local).
We use a Fire Tablet connected to an Underground Weather station about 300 yards away. We get a constant update and can use a stylus to switch to hourly/daily and forecast with a radar/satellite insert. (no Goreball Warming BS!).
Maybe she can be more effective somewhere else.
Thanks, the Gaying of any organization, business or church is often the beginning of the end of the “Gayed”!
Indeed.
Note that Bret Baier, a supposed Catholic, rejected the invitation of a conservative Catholic group, because it believes in male-female marriage. Bret is getting squishy and worried about his image, I guess.
Now we hear that he is part of the Fox forces opposed to Judge Jeannine Pirro.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.