Great and long article with Hanson ripping to shreds the never-Trumper’s idiotic review of Hanson’s new book
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/bulwark-review-the-case-for-trump-response/
Never What?
By Victor Davis Hanson
FTA:
I wrote a book, The Case for Trump, in an effort as an outsider who has no career investment in Trump and has never met him or visited the Trump White House to analyze how and why Donald J. Trump was elected president and why his agenda so far has been successful. One Gabriel Schoenfeld has just published a hysterical attack on that effort in the Bill KristolCharles Sykes new Bulwark, and it is emblematic of that venues promised Never Trump ad hominem assault on individual supporters of the president.
...
Willful Blindness
But where Schoenfeld, the supposed scholar of intelligence operations, becomes incoherent is in his surprising ignorance about the overreach of the administrative state in general, and, in particular, the role of the Steele dossier in ginning up Russian-collusion hysteria:
...
There is unfortunately a lot of ignorance in just those three silly paragraphs.
What exactly was the intent of the serial lawsuits challenging voting machines immediately following the election, the initial articles of impeachment, the efforts to subvert the Electoral College voting, the desperate efforts to invoke the emoluments clause, the 25th Amendment, and the ossified Logan Act, followed by the Mueller investigation, the tragicomic McCabe-Rosenstein palace coup, and the dozens of present House investigations if not to abort a presidency by means other than an election?
Rarely have such intentions been so shamelessly stated as in the September 5, 2018, New York Times op-ed by Anonymous timed to coincide with the release of Bob Woodwards latest insider account, this one of the supposedly imploding Trump White House. The unnamed Trump-administration official boasted that he and his patriotic #Resistance confederates were deep within the Trump administration and were stealthily using their bureaucratic powers to nullify any presidential efforts that they in their superior wisdom and morality found disagreeable. (It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room, Anonymous reassured readers.) According to the unelected and disgraced former FBI director Andrew McCabes own admission, both he and DOJ deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein discussed to the point of Rosenstein contemplating wearing a wire the possible 25th Amendment mechanisms under which they might remove an elected president. The zealous careerist McCabe also tells us that he had to send his FBI minions after Attorney General Jeff Sessions again for the good of us all.
Why did DOJ and FBI officials seek surveillance on American citizens without fully apprising a FISA court that the basis for such requests was an unverified dossier, compiled by a retired foreign national, who purchased unverified Russian sources, who himself had been fired from the FBI as a consultant, who was paid by the Clinton campaign, albeit stealthily through two firewalls, and who was the circular source for news accounts used to substantiate the dossier?
What business does the FBI have communicating with an informant prying into an ongoing presidential campaign? Why exactly did U.N. ambassador Samantha Power, mostly in her last year in office, make more than 260 requests to unmask the names of American citizens surveilled by the U.S. government (some of them mysteriously leaked) and then claim, under oath, that she, in fact, did not herself make those requests but that someone (unidentified) made them in her name? There is a reason, although ignored by Schoenfeld, that more than 20 FBI and DOJ officials have been fired, reassigned, demoted, retired, or resigned. And there is a reason that, on 245 occasions, the former director of the FBI claimed under oath to Congress that he either couldnt remember or did not know the answers to congressional questions. Try that tactic sometime with an IRS auditor.
...
:: who himself had been fired from the FBI as a consultant ::
We’ve all come to believe that this was “cover action”, right?
That was a great read...thanks for posting.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3734041/posts
ha! usually YOU find the post for me to put up...
Never What?
By Victor Davis Hanson
Love Don Surber
https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2019/03/its-jeremiah-wrights-party-now.html
It’s Jeremiah Wright’s party now
Five days after 19 Muslims destroyed the World Trade Center and attacked the Pentagon, the political protege of unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers, Barack Obama, attended his church.
Instead of quoting Jesus and the Bible, the preacher, Jeremiah Wright, quoted a Muslim. Instead of offering comfort and hope, Wright spiked the ball.
“America’s chickens are coming home,” he shouted with joy.
Wright preached hate like any tenured professor like well, Bill Ayers. Wright said, “Violence begets violence. Hatred begets hatred. And terrorism begets terrorism. A white ambassador said that, y’all. Not a black militant. Not a reverend who preaches about racism. An ambassador whose eyes are wide open and who is trying to get us to wake up and move away from this dangerous precipice upon which we are now poised. The ambassador said the people that we have wounded don’t have the military capability we have. But they do have individuals who are willing to die and take thousands with them. And we need to come to grips with that.”
...