Posted on 03/11/2019 2:21:26 PM PDT by dennisw
Thanks for the Ping.
Cell phones, wifi, and wireless headphones have be widely used by literally billions of people in the last 10 years. If there was any statistical increase in the incidence of brain tumors due to these new radio sources it would have shown up years ago. The wavelengths are much longer than visible light and we aren’t getting brain tumors from electric lights as far as I can tell. Only publicity hungry quacks would continue to propagate this nonsense.
RF energy is inversely proportional to the square root of the distance, so sticking little transmitters IN your ears is going to produce a much higher field strength in the brain than the same device even an inch further away.
I still use a wire headset just in case.
bookmark
Those are low fequency, 60 Hz magnetic fields. If they are damaging, it’s by an entirely different mechanism of action than damage caused by 5G transmission. If the price is right, maybe a good deal. If liquidity is important, probably not. How far from the lines was the house?
250 scientists? Wow that’s a lot. Like, is that maybe even all of the scientists in the world?
The stock jumped over $6 today, possibly on the strength of an upgrade from B of A, but there's also been back and forth rumors of what will be unveiled in a couple of weeks -- one possibility is the new model of AirPod.
Or, what about Bose wireless earbuds?
“How far from the lines was the house?”
About 100 yards.
But as for RF being dangerous, microwaves, yes. But even those would have given serious symptoms by now. If the FCC has granted a license then I’d say the technology is safe.
My friends have these and can listen to music and podcasts with ease. I haven’t afforded them yet but was going to. Maybe not.
You no doubt remember when Rush Limbaugh did his TV show for a full week with an old-school cell phone strapped to his head.
Current doctrine on microwaves centers around effects due to heating from energy absorption. Cancer fears posit different mechanisms that occur at lower power, which current standards don’t address, but these are considered unproven. The FCC uses an ANSI exposure standard. It’s been a while since I paid attention to the issue, but the number that pops into my mind is ANSI/IEEE C95.1. FWIW.
My hearing aids came with a bluetooth receiver that receives hangs around my neck. It may use FM between the receiver and the hearing aids. Sounds from my TV's and cell phone, play directly in my hearing aids. I've had them for years.
Dang, “Misprened” = “Misrepresented”. What happened with that?
Keep all that junk out of your ears. Pay attention to what is going on around you instead of acting like some zombie and being totally disconnected from your surroundings. When you get home turn on the stereo and listen to music from real speakers.
“Where might that be?”
The entire US forthwith.
Air pods only receive? They do not transmit. Right? They are not putting out any continuous blue tooth signal to connect with your iphone?
No, Dennis, why would they have microphones if they only receive? They’re two way for use for phone calls.
And where is it that monkeys may fly out of?
And if anyone ever gets a cancer, how would it be determined to be from Airpods as opposed to a vast number of other causes in our modern lives?
I have despised Apple products from the very first elitist hype that came with its unveiling, but this is a stupid leftist attack on a stupid leftist corporation.
It's so wrong that I feel compelled to defend Apple, when I have nothing good to say about them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.