Posted on 03/10/2019 7:33:03 AM PDT by MNDude
In a letter released to the public for the first time, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been found ordering U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber to investigate Hillary Clinton, according to watchdog group American Oversight.
The watchdog got hold of the letter after filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation. The letter’s existence, which was written in November 2017, was denied a year later in response to American Oversight’s litigation. The Justice Department maintained that Sessions didn’t direct Huber in writing and that any order was passed verbally.
In a letter released to the public for the first time, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been found ordering U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber to investigate Hillary Clinton, according to watchdog group American Oversight.
Since before the 2016 presidential elections, Donald Trump has repeatedly called for the DOJ to investigate Hillary Clinton. He often invoked the infamous “Lock her up” chant at rallies in front of his supporters — and continued his calls for prosecuting Clinton even after becoming president.
Austin Evers, American Oversight executive director, said the letter is proof that Sessions followed Trump’s arbitrary and “authoritarian” demands.
“‘Lock her up’ was wrong at campaign rallies, and it’s even worse coming from the Department of Justice. Even after this long, it’s still deeply shocking to see the black-and-white proof that Jeff Sessions caved to President Trump’s worst authoritarian impulses and ordered a wide-ranging investigation of his political opponents based on demands from Congress instead of the facts and the law.”
(Excerpt) Read more at inquisitr.com ...
And I reeled in a great big, fat TROLL!
LOL @ baiting.
No you got caught and backtracked like a clown on a unicycle.
In your Schiff-like haste you posted without reading context, got caught, changed your tact and hoped I`d ignore it and relent.
Go back to your chanporn site and your conspiracy nonsense.
Qtips are a cancer to FR, infecting posts .
I exposed another frothing at the mouth blithering chanporn conspiracy whacko.
Let's go back to the replay...
Ironic Qtards
That's you.
The porn chan Qtip feelings hurt?
Porn Chan conspiracy nut
That's you.
You chanporn site conspiracy nuts were warned to stay in your Qtip conspiracy box...
That's you too.
And yet you take umbrage at being called a troll. AMAZING!
LOL Can’t take being accused of being a troll from someone who does`t know the definition and whose first intention/assumption was to imply I was pro-Q when in fact the Qatar did NOT read the comments to divine intent.
Now THAT, is comedy.
Got anymore brilliant “research” to expose me with? Maybe some threatening FRemails you’d like to send?
Another stalker to amuse myself with.
I`m waiting. Try again.
Please, continue squirming. I'm enjoying this immensely.
Do you visit a chan site, 8chan?
Does it host porn if not child porn?
Does 8chan host Q conspiracy nonsense?
You do.
The answers are all yes.
Trolling is inflammatory or baseless accusations.
You picked the wrong fight.
47
Speaking of "conspiracy garbage"...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3625208/posts
Posted on 1/23/2018, 10:55:39 AM by Para-Ord.45
I didn't "imply" anything. I merely posted the link to a "conspiracy garbage" thread you created...which turns out to have actually been a troll trap.
Do you visit a porn chan site?
You do. Therefore its a fact not irrelevant or inflammatory.
Do you post anonymous conspiratorial nonsense from said site.
You so. Therefore it is a fact and not irrelevant or inflammatory.
You’d make a lousy lawyer.
Trolling is inflammatory or baseless accusations.
That's not what you posted earlier.
Back to the replay, sports fans...
It looks like there's more to it than you're claiming there is. You can't just leave out the incriminating part you don't like after the fact.
Perhaps you shouldn't have posted that after all.
You're hanging yourself with it.
You picked the wrong fight.
I didn't pick a fight, I picked exposure.
Are there aggregate sites where the
"anonymous conspiratorial nonsense" is posted?
You’d make a lousy lawyer.
Let's see if you lie on the stand when a lousy lawyer questions you.
Thanks for playing.
Would you care to go another round of whack-a-troll?
Mid-terms were not safe. House fell.
Why the bulls*t from Dear Leader?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.