Jeff Sessions’ Letter Shows DOJ Followed Trump’s Demand To Investigate Hillary Clinton

Inquistr ^

[MNDude]

In a letter released to the public for the first time, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been found ordering U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber to investigate Hillary Clinton, according to watchdog group American Oversight.

The watchdog got hold of the letter after filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation. The letter’s existence, which was written in November 2017, was denied a year later in response to American Oversight’s litigation. The Justice Department maintained that Sessions didn’t direct Huber in writing and that any order was passed verbally.

In a letter released to the public for the first time, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been found ordering U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber to investigate Hillary Clinton, according to watchdog group American Oversight.

Since before the 2016 presidential elections, Donald Trump has repeatedly called for the DOJ to investigate Hillary Clinton. He often invoked the infamous “Lock her up” chant at rallies in front of his supporters — and continued his calls for prosecuting Clinton even after becoming president.

Austin Evers, American Oversight executive director, said the letter is proof that Sessions followed Trump’s arbitrary and “authoritarian” demands.

“‘Lock her up’ was wrong at campaign rallies, and it’s even worse coming from the Department of Justice. Even after this long, it’s still deeply shocking to see the black-and-white proof that Jeff Sessions caved to President Trump’s worst authoritarian impulses and ordered a wide-ranging investigation of his political opponents based on demands from Congress instead of the facts and the law.”

[philman_36]

I've been threatened by bigger chidporn Chan retards than you.
You have some serious projection issues.

[Para-Ord.45]

LOL

The article deals with the exact same subject matter with a direct link to “left-leaning watchdog group, American Oversight,..”

A kook chanporn site conspiracy nut regurgitating some anonymous blathering about “mid-terms are safe. Watch CA...Trust sessions...Hillary will be arrested...”

trying to berate us on logical deduction and reasoning.

Go back to your short bus sandbox .

[philman_36]

Oral fixation much?

SAN FRAN MAYOR SIMULATES ORAL SEX ON TV CREW'S STICK MIC

[Para-Ord.45]

You chanporn site conspiracy nuts were warned to stay in your Qtip conspiracy box and STOP polluting regular posts with your conspiracy garbage.

[philman_36]

The article deals with the exact same subject matter with a direct link to “left-leaning watchdog group, American Oversight,..”
BWAHAHAHAHAHA
Once again...

I don't see a link to the FOIA documentation that I provided exposing American Oversight lies in that article. Do you?

So instead of answering my question you go off on a tangent.

Revisionism seems to be a strong point of yours.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1928889/posts?page=15#15
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

You can't even get a Bible verse right.

[philman_36]

Where have I done anything wrong?
I'm speaking of current issues.
You're the one bringing up "conspiracy garbage".

[philman_36]

Speaking of "conspiracy garbage"...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3625208/posts
Posted on 1/23/2018, 10:55:39 AM by Para-Ord.45

[philman_36]

I did warn you, yet you chose to persist.

[Para-Ord.45]

You're not too bright. Was I posting something because I believed it or was I smoking out the Qtards and mocking them? Oh yeah, ur dumb as a box of rocks, it was the latter:

[Para-Ord.45]

LOL

Next time, READ the post. Really READ it.

LOL

[Para-Ord.45]

Hey Schiff, that you?

Wanna see my tax returns colonoscopy results too ?

LOL

[philman_36]

Was I posting something because I believed it or was I smoking out the Qtards and mocking them?
You're the one who is as dumb as a box of rocks.

Oh yeah, ur dumb as a box of rocks, it was the latter:

Thanks for admitting you're nothing but a troll.

[philman_36]

Thanks for taking the bait.

[Para-Ord.45]

Just like there is a distinction between logical deduction and assumption there’s a diff between exposing chanporn conspiracy whackos and trolling.

Buy a dictionary.

Hey Schiff, want my tax returns next?

Copies of my colonoscopy ?

[philman_36]

You've outed yourself. Stop whining.

[Para-Ord.45]

LOL

You post my post ,ASSUME SOMETHING, and didn’t`t even bother to read it in context or even read the comments !!!

Wait, it gets worse. You backtrack faster than a clown on a unicycle and try to imply something wholly different than your first ASSUMPTION !!!

LOL

Walk away boy, walk away.

[philman_36]

... and trolling.

...and mocking them?

That's all you, buddy.

[philman_36]

You post my post ,ASSUME SOMETHING, and didn’t`t even bother to read it in context or even read the comments !!!

There's no need to ASSUME anything.
You clearly and plainly stated that your intent was to smoke certain people out and MOCK THEM.

That's what trolls do and that makes you a troll.

[philman_36]

The funniest thing in all of this is you didn't even know you were being baited.
I did warn you to stop what you were doing. (setting out the bait)
And you swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

[Para-Ord.45]

Wrong again sport. Walk away.

” : to antagonize (others) online by deliberately posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content.”

You even got that WRONG. A simple definition.

You post my post ,ASSUME SOMETHING, and didn’t`t even bother to read it in context or even read the comments !!!

Wait, it gets worse. You backtrack faster than a clown on a unicycle and try to imply something wholly different than your first ASSUMPTION !!!