Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Mo Brooks called for Mitch McConnell’s ouster as Senate majority leader, and called him “head of the swamp”. That must have pissed off McConnell, who threw all of his support to Strange in the primary and then the runoff.

Trump’s endorsement of Strange was not a good decision on his part, but he was dependent on McConnell’s cooperation to move his agenda forward and as you say, Strange was a reliable vote. I’d say that was a “rock and a hard place” situation.

But to say that without Moore in the primary, Mo Brooks would have won is pure 20-20 hindsight speculation. Brooks couldn’t muster even 20% of the vote. Strange and Brooks would have split Moore’s vote, but it’s practically impossible to know with any certainty how that split would have gone.

We do know that McConnell threatened an ethics investigation if Moore had won. What would he have done if Brooks had been the nominee? Would he have withheld party support as he did with Moore? And if Brooks had won against Jones, what would he have done?

And what would the Rats have thrown against Strange if he was the nominee? You can be damn sure they would have made an issue of the slimy way in which he oozed into the Senate. What else would they have come up with? Bimbo eruptions? Financial misdeeds?

We will probably never know, but we can be pretty certain they would have come up with something damaging what with the power of the compromised FBI working hard to dig up dirt, and to invent dirt if necessary.

Would that, along with the ever-growing problem of vote fraud, have been enough to give Jones the victory over Strange? That seems unlikely, but again, that’s impossible to know.

But if the Republicans can’t come up with someone better than EITHER Moore or Strange, they deserve to lose.


93 posted on 03/09/2019 1:17:22 PM PST by Fresh Wind (Trump: "America will never be a socialist country!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Fresh Wind
Mo Brooks called for Mitch McConnell’s ouster as Senate majority leader, and called him “head of the swamp”. That must have pissed off McConnell, who threw all of his support to Strange in the primary and then the runoff.

You're right -- I forgot about that. That was a completely unnecessary blunder on Brooks' part, and Moore later doubled down on it in the runoff.

It's one thing to call for the ouster of a sitting party leader in the Senate when there's a credible challenge to his leadership, but in this case there wasn't even a hint of a challenge to McConnell from any other GOP senator. Why the hell would a Senate candidate antagonize a guy who was going to be his party's leader in the Senate for the foreseeable future?

97 posted on 03/09/2019 3:40:27 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson