[Cletus.D.Yokel]

I find that rather odd behavior. Why would you go among the Qwivvering masses to defend bagster against a known troll when we have established (blu) that bagster is one and only troll-killer. Such that he doesn’t require any support or any of us to engage trolls. So, either he is the rapier-wit defined here or he needs someone to watch his back. This is odd, unless...

[TXnMA]

"This is odd, unless..."

"unless..." WHAT?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I went to read a thread that interested me -- and found it to be full of anti-Q troll behavior.

Since...

1. ...I enjoy troll-whacking,

2. ...I have a pretty efficient and effective record of doing so,

3. ...I recognize and approve that our MoD asks us not to troll-thump on our Q threads,

4. ...and, recognizing that Q is asking us to "go public" now,

5. ...I encountered a known (paid?) Q-attacker (OFF QThread) -- who was begging to be stomped,

6. ...and -- who was pounding on my QFRiend -- our own Bagster...

SO -- I decided to "fire a (public) shot" -- using a meme I had created for precisely such a "whining backseat brat" occasion -- and which I wanted to publicize to "red-pill" all Non-Q FReepers.

~~~~~~~~~~

The paidshill/troll attempted one (lame) response, and my (one) retort shut him down (no further response to me -- or any additional posts on that thread...)

Perhaps I can't claim full credit for running the troll off of that thread, but, I don't hesitate to claim a "killshot contribution" to the QVictory!

~~~~~~~~~~

NOW -- since you signed onto FR on my 67th birthday, (over 18 years ago) and preceded my decision to transition from lurking to posting by a whole "Q" number of days -- I bow to your vast seniority and wisdom, and ask again:

"What did you intend by your: "This is odd, unless..."?

Keeping in mind that our motto is, "Where We Go One We Go All", please enlighten us all...

ThanQ and FRegards,
TXnMA