More pudding for those who think it’s far-fetched that abortion, baby parts, immigration, adrenochrome, and HRC are not related:
The Isaias family began dumping large amounts of campaign contributions into American political campaigns, including $90,000 to Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign. As a result, after reaching out to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for asylum, the Isaias’ were granted expedited immigration into the U.S. Clinton’s State Department then rebuffed attempts by Ecuador to extradite them to face justice.
Once in America, the Isaias family owned and operated DaVinci Biosciences and DV Biologics, companies that contracted exclusively with Planned Parenthood of Orange County to receive aborted baby tissues and organs, which they trafficked overseas.
Roberto and William Isaias’ nephew, Estafano Isaias, Jr., who was involved in profit-taking from the two biotech companies, also owned a business that sold pornography online.
After the release of the Center for Medical Progress’ undercover video exposés in 2015, Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas sued the companies for their illegal body parts trade, and in 2017 reached a settlement agreement that fined them $7.8 million, and ordered their businesses to close.
“We have mentioned the Isaias brothers repeatedly in articles that we have published over the past couple of years, including the corruption in the Obama Administration, which allowed them to come to our country where they committed further crimes,” said Newman. “We hoped that someone would take notice.”
Just last month, Operation Rescue published an exposé that delved into the market for aborted baby body parts. It revealed that the DaVinci biotech companies sent tissues and organs obtained from Planned Parenthood around the world to businesses that were working to develop anti-aging drugs for the wealthy.
https://cal-catholic.com/brothers-in-baby-parts-traffic-arrested-by-ice/
Can any mathfag who can see this verify the math here? True?
___________________________________________________________
I say legit.
https://stattrek.com/online-calculator/binomial.aspx
This should give us confidence that the trolls on this thread are not skeptics, but DS accomplices that should be shunned. They are on the side of those that want to kill babies after birth in the name of “right to choose.”
Go Trump - MAGA
Go Melania aka Lady MAGA
The covfefe is building THE WALL
The covfefe is building THE WALL
Kek has a long moustache
Kek has a long moustache
Q is real
Odd.. I'm not a mathfag but I did have 2 semesters of statistics and probability in college.
I was working on this very thing last night. The issue is defining the parameters. Who says a certain percentage proves anything. But... a very low probability does give you some insight.
IMO the trouble is defining the parameters.. Looks like they used 60 minutes/hour for 8 hours as a possible post interval. You gotta make a lot of rules for things like... DJT and Q have the same opportunity to post at the same time. There are not other contributing factors that would cause them to post about something. Blah.. blah.. must be totally independent opportunities.
I was trying to use a theory about rolling 2 dice and coming up doubles. But lets say the dice are (8*60) = 480 sided. What are the odds of rolling doubles. Pretty low. But then you gotta factor in how many rolls by each participant. Trump tweets about 9 times a day while Q tweets about 6.
I'm not saying this is not right, but it takes a lot for granted.. YMMV
Can any mathfag who can see this verify the math here?
******************
OMG(osh). The memories of four-page+ problems. Thank goodness for calculators!!!
The formula for binomial probability is correct. Using the given information, the math is correct (see above exclamation).
The Law of Large Numbers states that the more times an experiment is conducted the closer those outcomes approach the theoretical probability. E.g., when tossing a coin there is a 50-50 chance the coin will land on heads or tails. (My teaching 7th-graders, we learn about independent outcomes involving coins, spinnners, 6-sided number cubes, and decks of playing cards.)
In this probability formula,
n = the fixed # of trials
x = specified # of successes
n-x = # of failures
p = probability of success in any given trial, i.e., 1/480 (This would be the point of question!)
1-p = probability of failure in any given trial.
On a side note (smile), music also speaks wonders to me, and I found this song running through my brain as I wrote this post:
Sam Cooke, 1960
https://youtu.be/sdjgj5A2gOs
Art Garfunkel, James Taylor, Paul Simon, 1977
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0bU9llGUic
There, now maybe everyone you were reaching out to can see it. Notable if true. Saving for future use. Thanks.
SS1