[tomkat]

Thanks very much for this.

[Jeff Chandler]

If the Courts were to intervene under these circumstances and end the emergency it would in essence be overriding the procedure designed by Congress to deal with the issue.

Bingo.

[Macoozie]

Throw all reason and objective truth out the window.

5 justices can do what they want to do.

7-2 decided we could kill babies.
5-4 decided we had to buy a product from a private company or have our money taken by force.
5-4 decided our property wasn’t really our property.

[SENTINEL]

Last I checked the military reports to the Commander-In-Chief alone. There is no court in the chain of command. Trump needs to double down on this with direct orders to build without ceasing, despite any court orders.

[Jacquerie]

The Constitution famously set up checks between the branches.

Thanks to the 17th Amendment, Congress doesn’t have the will to use their available checks against a runaway judiciary.

The practical fact is, Scotus is despotic. There is no Constitutional limit to its diktats.

Start with repeal of the 17A. Article V.

[Political Junkie Too]

The courts must defer to procedure designed by Congress to resolve disputes as between the Article I and Article II branches of government.

The question here is what happens if the procedure designed by Congress leads to a conclusion unfavorable to Democrats? We all know what happens next: Democrats run to the courts to overturn the results of that procedure.

Results that are unfavorable to Democrats are, by definition, illegitimate and must be corrected by any means necessary.

-PJ