Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

A historical takeaway from the cold and hot war air battles between the U.S. Air Force and the USSR is that in the air-to-air mission, a country that equips its fighters with airborne radar and sensors allows more autonomous action and actually favors tactical simplicity and operational autonomy — even though the equipment becomes more complex.  In air-to-ground, airborne simplicity indicators are usually smaller formations and allowance to maneuver independently into weapon launch envelopes primarily in a weapons-free environment.  Embedding technology into the weapon itself — bombs and rocket-fired weapons — has also made a revolutionary difference.
1 posted on 02/27/2019 6:56:02 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

peace through strength


2 posted on 02/27/2019 6:58:16 AM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Fight generation stealth fighters? Doesn’t anyone edit anymore?

L


3 posted on 02/27/2019 6:59:30 AM PST by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

They have little to be “scared of”, unless they choose to attack us. We don’t shoot first.


6 posted on 02/27/2019 7:10:46 AM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
We remember Vietnam.

Our military won Tet, but Walter Cronkite, "the most trusted man in America" said we were beaten, and congress obediently declared defeat.

Today, there is no one trusted in the press, and congress is too busy enabling the murder of born alive babies to act.

We remember Vietnam. Vietnam is now a trading partner, manufacturing center and part of a stabilizing influence in the area.

"We", that is to say our media-marxist-congressional complex, lost the war, but we won the peace.

7 posted on 02/27/2019 7:14:41 AM PST by null and void (If socialism is so grand, why are Guatemalans coming here instead of going to Venezuela?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

What is the point of rattling Russia?

We are not at war with them. This needs to chill down a notch.


10 posted on 02/27/2019 7:36:01 AM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
A lasting phrase used by President Obama is actually appropriate in this situation: the Russian are getting all "wee-weed up."

He also dismissed Russia as 'regional power' acting out of weakness ...

13 posted on 02/27/2019 7:40:50 AM PST by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

NATO head: Trump's tough talk has added $100B to alliance, helped deter Russia

FoxNews.com ^ | Jan 27, 2019 | Gregg Re | Fox News

"President Trump has been very clear," Stoltenberg told fill-in host John Roberts.

"He is committed to NATO. He stated that clearly just a few days ago and also at the NATO summit in July.

But at the same time, he has clearly stated that NATO allies need to invest more. And therefore at the summit in July last year, we agreed to do more to step up -- and now we see the results."

In all, Stolenberg continued, "by the end of next year, NATO allies will add hundred – 100 billion extra US dollars toward defense. So we see some real money and some real results. And we see that the clear message from President Donald Trump is having an impact."

In July 2018, NATO leaders pledged their “unwavering commitment” to boost defense spending, following stern words from the president. The U.S. and European allies signed a declaration stating they were “committed to improving the balance of sharing the costs and responsibilities of alliance membership.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

23 posted on 02/27/2019 8:30:44 AM PST by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I found it an interesting point that the Russian Embassy (of all places) would admonish us to remember Vietnam, and the author retorted that what we should remember about Vietnam was Linebacker II in 1972.

Good point, Ivan.


26 posted on 02/27/2019 8:44:01 AM PST by rlmorel (If racial attacks were as common as the Left wants you to think, they wouldn't have to make them up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I was a little young to remember much about Viet Nam. It was way over by the time I was of age. I have, however, read books. One called “Thud Ridge” tells about the fighter jets.

It tells of “blue-eyed, blonde” Vietnamese pilots flying Migs who turned tail and RAN across the Chinese boarder when they even suspected the F4 Phantoms were anywhere near - because our boys were “not allowed” to follow them. Better jets, better men, crappy liberal politicians.


31 posted on 02/27/2019 9:00:59 AM PST by HeadOn (Just let me do my job...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I work with a lot of former AF maintainers on a military sales contract. Quite a few have worked on a variety of ‘platforms’, as they call them. Some of them have worked on the F22 or have worked on the F15s and 16s that would go against the F22 in simulations. They chuckle when they talk about the results of these scenarios because the F22 usually knocks most, if not all, of the OpFor out of the sky before those pilots even know what’s going on. I don’t ask about the details, as I don’t understand them. I just smile knowing that some of my tax money goes to such an awesome machine and it has an American flag on it. But, as amazing as the F22 is, and they assure me it is amazing, it’s old. It’s been around for a long time. Enter....the F35, a plane a few of these guys have worked on.

From what these guys have told me, the F35 takes it to another level in many ways. And given that it can be configured to meet the requirements of the different services and the different missions, within each, make it a very special aircraft. It has had it’s problems. But, I’ve been told that they’re planning on putting systems in that plane that haven’t even been invented yet. The ideas are just something an engineer drew on a cocktail napkin, kind of like the F16, and then they’re trying to figure out how to reverse engineer it. But, I’ve challenged them on the cost. Only to learn that, while it is very expensive, as each plane is made and subsequent models are produced, they’re able to reduce production costs, so what was a $100 million plane, becomes significantly cheaper over time.

But, based on what they’ve told me about the planes current capabilities and what they’re forecasting for the future, I have no problem chipping in for the $100,000,000.00.


40 posted on 02/27/2019 10:17:23 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This piece from a different source appeared earlier and was rightly judged q puff piece of F-35 propaganda. There are still major systems that do not work and are maybe even not fixable without a complete redesign.

“If a Russia... ever was to see an F-35 inside its airspace’,

And that’s the problem - to be effective the F-35 has to strap on so much stuff that it is highly visible, unlike the F-22 which the Russian won’t see.


41 posted on 02/27/2019 10:46:41 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson