but if nothing more, one less thing for the women haters to crow about....
one less "war on boys and men" thread....
Of course not ONE of them can show where the Constitution forbids such.
More Leftist treason and erosion of the Constitution AS WRITTEN AND ORIGINALLY UNDERSTOOD AND INTENDED.
Libs love this because they think it will stifle willingness for any Prez to go to war.
Unconstitutional? Really...the Militia was specific to males. Registration is just a population count of males.
Really puts the gender panderer and radical feminists in the horns of a dilemma because the next lawsuit will be to require that women also be subjected along with men to being drafted into a combat arms MOS. Of course I do not agree with either but the feminists will now have to admit they do not have the physical and biological tools to compete with men in the arena of combat arms.Yes, Virginia, there is a difference between men and women.
I would expect that deferments for women would be constitutional which will offset the ludicrous notion that they are equal to men in wartime combat.
I wonder how younger women are going to feel about this "gift" their older sisters bequeathed to them....
They live the draft
They want special privileges, not equality. They want rights, not responsibilities. Sorry, this is the logical consequence of their demands.
All the sophistry stripped away...only a homo would want to draft little girls and force them into a military structure.
Square THIS circle:
1. Unpopular war, not enough troops
2. Guy gets draft notice
3. Decides he’s a GIRL
4. ?????
Just wait.
I want reparations from women for violating my constitutional rights all these years.
Fifth Amendment is all about criminal procedure.
Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
So the with all due respect to the referenced judge, the wires are crossed imo.
What am I overlooking?
So this is all highly fantasy but I would make sure my daughter NEVER EVER gets drafted.
13th Amendment;
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
The Woodrow Wilson administration proved in court that this doesn’t mean exactly what is says in 1918. It was during the all out progressive attack on the Constitution for WWI. They relied on Civil War cases that predated the Amendment, and by providing a list of other nations that conscript. So it was allowed here by a combination of law that should have been superseded by the 13th amendment and by a body of foreign law.
Wilson argued that draftees were actually volunteers because the whole nation had “volunteered” when the Congress declared war.
The same logic was the “Fire in a crowded theater” ruling. The case was someone handing out handbills against the draft. They claimed 1st amendment protection. The court ruled that speech opposing the draft was akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater.
The constitution is long dead. We are not even a nation of laws either because justice is wildly unequally applied.
We are now a nation of judicial whims.
The decision was based on the fact that women can now volunteer for a combat MOS and therefore they should also be eligible for the draft. The next logical conclusion using that logic is to require them once drafted to be assigned to a combat MOS along with men. Only a matter of time before a liberal judge legislates away the biological differences between men and women and sends women as fodder to the front
These cases come forward because the shyster lawyer found a way to get paid. His clients don’t pay for this. In civil rights litigation, upon winning the government pay all of their legal fees.
So we the taxpayer just bought a Malibu house for a lawyer who successfully argued that any normal little girl can be drafted.
They hate the military, so the next draft we see will be for “national service”. The little 18 year old girl you know from church who wants to go to college and have a family will be sent off to work at a hospital or day care center in Chicago or Baltimore or east St Louis.
And it will all be legal.
How is a male only draft not Constitutional? Would this include trannie, transgender, and all the other sickos? Of course, that would seriously affect the quality of our fighting force, which is the intention of the traitorous libtards.