Posted on 02/18/2019 10:04:07 PM PST by ransomnote
Trying to recall myself. I believe your ‘7’ is correct when counting kinetic attempts. Upwards of 20 scuttled plans, tho.
Thanks much, great Oracle!
Your posts are essential for those of us that aren’t able to take the time to sift through the threads thoroughly.
Oh, BTW, Q just dropped another one. :)
I have no further info on the shooter from yesterday’s Michigan event.
I’m chalking it up as an intentional FF until I hear different.
That’s 5 in 5 days.
So she arrived in DC yesterda, hmm?
~~~~~~~~~~
Is it just me or is RBG standing up straighter?? In the past her head was down because of the osteoporosis causing her neck to curve down.
FROM A FEW DAYS AGO:
This is very interesting. 3-D chess at its best.
~~~~~~~~
Wall Analysis: The Path Ahead (from Zen Master)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3728223/posts?page=1
Posted on 2/16/2019, 5:45:24 AM by LS
My source on all things courts and legal, Zen Master, has weighed in with some excellent information on the path ahead for the Declaration of Emergency.
1. For a case to be heard, it must meet at least these three conditions: standing, ripeness, and aggrieved party.
First, standing: the DoE only affects four states: TX, NM, AZ, and CA.
Only a party in one of those four can bring a suit in the Ninth (CA/AZ), Tenth (NM), or Fifth (TX) Circuit Courts. But even before you can do that, you must be an aggrieved party, meaning you must show direct immediate harm from what is happening (i.e., building the wall). Watch how this plays out in a moment.
Now, its frequently argued here that a friendly party can bring a case immediately in a friendly venue (such as the Fifth, which is mostly GOP/conservative but not unanimous).
No. A court would view this as a type of fraud, since the two parties are considered friendly and would rule it an abuse of the court. It would be tossed. I dont know, but there might even be legal penalties for bringing such a suit.
Second, this is different from the Travel Ban, which was national and enabled a Hawaiian judge to put a stay on it. Again, this is region and state specific, meaning it will only affect the Ninth, Tenth, and Fifth-but not until the wall starts going up in those states.
Third, no challenge can be brought until a case is ripe. In OH, Gov. DeWine said he will sight the Heartbeat Bill, which PP will challenge. But he hasnt signed it yet, so there is no challenge yet.
No wall challenge can be made until the case is ripe, meaning until Trump ACTUALLY SPENDS DoE MONEY TO BUILD SOME OF THE WALL.
2. That brings us to the emergency declaration. Congress has already authorized, and Trump signed (which many of you did not want him to sign) a bill with $1.375b to start building the wall.
Trump has also invoked two statutes, 31 U.S.C. section 9705 and 10 U.S.C. section 284 to spend about $3.1b. These statutes dont require an emergency declaration.
There is a third statute, 10 U.S.C. section 2808 with $3.6b which does require an emergency declaration.
Heres the genius of how Trump is doing this: the money will be spent sequentially, with the $3.6b designated under 10 U.S.C. section 2808 (the national emergency money, if you will) spent last.
Trump will spend about $4.7b before he ever gets to the DoE money-and thats the only point at which that DoE can be challenged.
3. Now, there WILL be a Congressional challenge to the authority to do issue this declaration in DC almost immediately, and that (says Zen Master) will be struck down both on standing and ripeness grounds.
4. Go back to standing: the case cannot come up in the Ninth or Tenth Circuses until wall building WITH DoE $$ actually starts there.
Finally, precisely because Congress has just authorized $1.75b for the wall-regardless of the qualifiers-it cannot be argued that Trumps wall is something different (i.e, somehow unconstitutional). In other words, by passing the bill-and by Trump signing it-Congress just MADE IT 100% LEGAL.
Which reenforces to me that POTUS was placed there by The Lord, who protects him every day and night!
You're killin' me, Smalls. :(
:: meaning until Trump ACTUALLY SPENDS DoE MONEY TO BUILD SOME OF THE WALL. ::
And that money must be DoE money NOT included in legislation current or PREVIOUS.
>>you must be an aggrieved party, meaning you must show direct immediate harm from what is happening (i.e., building the wall).
Well, I have to say they’ve got that. A wall would cause direct immediate harm to the Dems because their supply of drugs, trafficked humans, MS-13 gang members available for murder-for-hire, etc., would be severely impacted.
qmap.pub at drop #2807.
263K+ at 1150 EST.
Isn’t there a claim of a federal easement 100 yards from the actual border point all along both borders?
“””Bohemian Grove.”””
It’s natural for people to socialize. Some form cliques, some groups, clubs, etc. Some groups are all about networking, even if they deny it.
Some groups have “exoteric” answers to outsider questions, but “esoteric” meanings taught to those inside through their rituals, metaphors and allegories.
“Owl of Minerva” and “Cremation of Care” is weird.
Plenty of info about BH + occult on the net.
On another note, an anon drug this NYT article in:
Opinion
A Nation of Weavers
The social renaissance is happening from the ground up.
By David Brooks - Opinion Columnist
Feb. 18, 2019
My something extra was starting something nine months ago at the Aspen Institute called Weave: The Social Fabric Project. The first core idea was that social isolation is the problem underlying a lot of our other problems. The second idea was that this problem is being solved by people around the country, at the local level, who are building community and weaving the social fabric. How can we learn from their example and nationalize their effect?
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/18/opinion/culture-compassion.html
TFC No.5258800
After being at the Slimes, I scraped the bottom of my shoes off here:
Weave: The Social Fabric Project
https://www.aspeninstitute.org/programs/weave-the-social-fabric-initiative/
What will you be, a ripper or a Weaver?
Social fragmentation is the core challenge of our day. We long to be together, but we are apart. We are isolated by distrust, polarization, trauma and incivility. We live in a hyper-individualistic culture that pays lip service to community but which actually values success above relationship, ego above care, the market above society and tribal divisions over common humanity.
The question for each of us is: What can I do today and tomorrow to replace loneliness, division and distrust with relationship, community and purpose?
Weave is a community of people who are helping each other answer this question. We seek to learn from those who are weaving communities everywhere, establishing connection, building relationships, offering care and creating intimacy and trust. We want to spread the values they live out every day. We want to be part of a cultural revolution that replaces a culture of hyper-individualism with a culture of relationalism, a way of living that puts our connections with one another at the center of our lives. The revolution will be moral or it will not be at all.
To learn more about the program, contact Weave.
https://www.aspeninstitute.org/programs/weave-the-social-fabric-initiative/about-weave-the-social-fabric-project/
David Brooks on Weave: The Social Fabric Project
https://youtu.be/uKcrGvQXJII 2:18 mins CC
SJW in denial about mankind’s fallen nature.
Hahahahahahahahahaha.
Oopsie.
I wondered what the button was for. My bad.
Weiner’s laptop
tick tock
ping to bagster
a song for the Oracle?
___________________________________________________________
Let’s think about that!
Q
264,267 Online at qmap.com
Thank you everyone!
I finally caught up. So much to digest!
This Qanon forum is the best place EVER!
Can anyone give a quick synopsis of the UT included in #2808?
I can’t risk watching a 30 minute UT at work...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.