Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: miss marmelstein
William is almost 37; he's a few months younger than Kate.

Harry, OTOH, looks emaciated, scruffy, sloppy, unkempt, miserable, and has unfixed holes in the soles of his shoes.

62 posted on 02/17/2019 12:55:59 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons

We have to disagree about William and Harry. It’s sort of the usual first born against the second born. William has always struck me as boring (as his wife has always bored me silly) but probably an upstanding person who will be a good if dull king. But I am shocked at his appearance at 37; Diana died at 37 if I remember and she was in excellent shape.

Harry is the wild child, obviously. You may not see it but he has a sexiness that William does not possess. That doesn’t mean he is either smart or good. It’s just that he has that male animal quality that attracts women and photographers.

As you know, we also disagree about Diana who I adored. She was as mad as they come - all Spencers are crazy - but I enjoy crazy...from a distance. Much more interesting than safe and secure.


103 posted on 02/17/2019 2:59:48 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson