We have to disagree about William and Harry. It’s sort of the usual first born against the second born. William has always struck me as boring (as his wife has always bored me silly) but probably an upstanding person who will be a good if dull king. But I am shocked at his appearance at 37; Diana died at 37 if I remember and she was in excellent shape.
Harry is the wild child, obviously. You may not see it but he has a sexiness that William does not possess. That doesn’t mean he is either smart or good. It’s just that he has that male animal quality that attracts women and photographers.
As you know, we also disagree about Diana who I adored. She was as mad as they come - all Spencers are crazy - but I enjoy crazy...from a distance. Much more interesting than safe and secure.
Di was 36 when she died, IIRC; which I believe I do.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...I never did care much for Harry and now I loathe him and do NOT find him attractive; let alone "sexy" in any way. And emotional cripples, not to mention STUPID people, send me up the proverbial wall!
OTOH... I do find a true "eccentric" ( which the Brit aristo class is full of )fascinating.
Di was a train wreck, so is Harry, and Sparkles is a wannabe Kardashian overlaid with delusions of Disney princesses and THE PRINCESS DIARIES...which were aimed at tween girls with merde for brains.
Yes, the Spencer family has been absolutely mad for centuries; not a good gene pool at all!