Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster; bitt

Why was [NV] barred from entering prior to?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I gave bitt my best speculation on that in my just previous post. But I see now that [LL] was in charge at the time.

Could it be that she was considered to be THEIR derp honey trap and that they had to control her carefully? .... with the Q team monitoring developments? Sorry I am unable to give facts to back that up at the moment.....be back in minute,....

:-D

Thanks for the kind words! Glad to help!

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~


452 posted on 02/16/2019 10:45:33 PM PST by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]


To: TEXOKIE; bagster
(money quote- "The U.S. Attorney’s office in New York confirmed Wednesday to The Hill that it let Veselnitskaya into the country on a grant of immigration parole from October 2015 to early January 2016."

((the same attny's office involved with HRC, LL, etc) I took snips of the article ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/341788-exclusive-doj-let-russian-lawyer-into-us-before-she-met-with-trump

The Moscow lawyer had been turned down for a visa to enter the U.S. lawfully but then was granted special immigration parole by then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch for the limited purpose of helping a company owned by Russian businessman Denis Katsyv, her client, defend itself against a Justice Department asset forfeiture case in federal court in New York City

The Moscow lawyer had been turned down for a visa to enter the U.S. lawfully but then was granted special immigration parole by then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch for the limited purpose of helping a company owned by Russian businessman Denis Katsyv, her client, defend itself against a Justice Department asset forfeiture case in federal court in New York City.

During a court hearing in early January 2016, as Veselnitskaya’s permission to stay in the country was about to expire, federal prosecutors described how rare the grant of parole immigration was as Veselnitskaya pleaded for more time to remain in the United States.

“In October the government bypassed 
the normal visa process and gave a type of extraordinary 
permission to enter the country called immigration parole,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Monteleoni explained to the judge during a hearing on Jan. 6, 2016.

“That's a discretionary act that the statute allows the attorney general to do in extraordinary circumstances. In this case, we 
did that so that Mr. Katsyv could testify. And we made the 
further accommodation of allowing his Russian lawyer into the 
country to assist,” he added.

The prosecutor said the Justice Department was willing to allow the Russian lawyer to enter the United States again as the trial in the case approached so she could help prepare and attend the proceedings.

The court record indicates the presiding judge asked the Justice Department to extend Veselnitskaya’s immigration parole another week until he decided motions in the case. There are no other records in the court file indicating what happened with that request or how Veselnitskaya appeared in the country later that spring. The U.S. Attorney’s office in New York confirmed Wednesday to The Hill that it let Veselnitskaya into the country on a grant of immigration parole from October 2015 to early January 2016.

Justice Department and State Department officials could not immediately explain how the Russian lawyer was still in the country in June for the meeting with Trump Jr. and the events in Washington.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) has demanded the U.S. government provide him all records on how Veselnitskaya entered and traveled in the U.S., a request that could shed additional light on her activities.

458 posted on 02/16/2019 10:59:19 PM PST by bitt (new q post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]

To: TEXOKIE
Why was [NV] barred from entering prior to?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I gave bitt my best speculation on that in my just previous post.

I have to admit, Texy, I didn't read your posts word for word. Time constraints, you see.

Can you post in just a few words the answer, or your speculation, that answers the above question please?

That's the only aspect I need to tell the story of that post, I think, as best I can.

Bagster


467 posted on 02/16/2019 11:33:44 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson