“He further claims that removing the President by assassination is bigger than removing him by using the 25th amendment.”
I am not a Q fan, but he was referring to the failed attempt at assassination balanced against the failed attempt by 25th amendment.
Have we heard from anyone on HOW a handful of DO_ (UNELECTED employees) is not simply a “soft coup” but actually -and according to the 25th Amendment process- a CONSPIRACY OF SEDITION? Connect the dots?
A felony and subject to penalties up to and including death.
So was I.
But Q's comment wasn't contingent on the success or failure of either plot. The point is, removal by assassination is "bigger" than removal by 25th amendment.
Your distinction is a point not worth making, whatever it is.
I'm not a "fan" either. This isn't pro rasslin'.
Bagster