Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored

We keep shooting ourselves in the foot over stuff like this. Apparently, their ‘fix’ isn’t much better, as it will have a rollover issue in a hundred years or so. We really need to start thinking about longer-term timeframes for our technology. If it can’t handle dates 10,000 years into the future, it should be a non-starter.


19 posted on 02/14/2019 11:07:59 AM PST by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: zeugma
We keep shooting ourselves in the foot over stuff like this.

Right you are. As things stand, manufacturers seem to go for the cheapest solution possible. Intelligent software developers are usually aware of the potential problems. My computer science professor in 1973 was already teaching solutions to the Y2K problem.

22 posted on 02/14/2019 11:16:45 AM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma
> If it can’t handle dates 10,000 years into the future, it should be a non-starter.

Hell yes, although to be honest I'd probably settle for 1000 years. But clearly, 100 years is not enough -- witness the Unix Epoch at ~68 years. Some of our technology will survive over 100 years.

I hope to live long enough to see Unix 32-bit rollover (I'll be 86). May it be the last of the big rollovers.

31 posted on 02/14/2019 12:04:53 PM PST by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government."`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson